Table of Contents

 

UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of


the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.          )

 

Filed by the Registrant ý

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o

Check the appropriate box:

o

Preliminary Proxy Statement

o

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

ý

Definitive Proxy Statement

o

Definitive Additional Materials

o

Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

WHITE MOUNTAINS INSURANCE GROUP, LTD.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

ý

No fee required.

o

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

(1)

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

(2)

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

(3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

(4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

(5)

Total fee paid:

o

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

o

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided¨ 

Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2)Rules 14a6(i)(1) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

0-11

 

(1)

Amount Previously Paid:

(2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

(3)

Filing Party:

(4)

Date Filed:

 


Table of Contents

 


Notice of 20202022 

Annual General Meeting

Of Members and

Proxy Statement

 

Proxy Statement


 

 


Table of Contents

 

LETTER FROM THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

 

FROM OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS

 

Dear Fellow Shareholders:

 

2019 was a strong year for our Company driven by good operating results in our main businesses and strong absolute investment returns.  Our share price increased 30%.  We also deployed $435 million into businesses during the year, and ended 2019 with undeployed capital at $1.0 billion.  This level of undeployed capital reflects management’s thoughtful and patient redeployment and return of capital over the past several years following sales of a number of our large businesses between 2015 and 2017 that generated $4 billion in proceeds.  Your Board believes that this patient approach to redeployment will serve owners well in the years to come.

Strong Financial Performance

We finished 20192021 with book value per share of $1,024$1,176 and adjusted book value per share of $1,018, increases$1,190, decreases of 14%7% and 15%6% from the prior year.year, respectively. Excluding the gain from themark-to-market decline in our investment in MediaAlpha, transaction in February 2019, BVPS and ABVPS each grew 8%.  We focus management on growing ABVPS because we believe that, in the long term, growth in marketadjusted book value per share will followincreased 4% for the year, reflecting positive results from our operating businesses.

Ark produced good underwriting results in a heavy catastrophe year, while growing full year premiums 77%. At BAM, investor demand for bond insurance remained strong, and BAM insured a record $15.6 billion of par in the primary market. NSM finished 2021 with new highs for pro forma controlled premiums and pro forma adjusted EBITDA. Likewise, Kudu produced strong growth in ABVPS.  In 2019, our one-year total shareholder return was 30.2%. Each of our main operating businesses performed well this year,adjusted EBITDA and our total investment portfolio returned 20.4% (15.5% excludingcompleted five acquisitions during the gain from the MediaAlpha transaction).  A very satisfying result.year.

 

Execution of Our Business StrategyThe businesses we own today position us well for the future. As is the White Mountains “way,” we continue to prospect for acquisition opportunities, via our “platform business” and at the parent company.

 

During 2019, your Company made good progress on capital deployment, putting $435 million to work.  Three significant deals emerged from our platform companies: (i) Embrace, a pet insurance MGA acquired by NSM, (ii) the acquisitionEnhancement of NSM’s collector car renewal rightsESG Practices and (iii) our buyout of Oaktree’s 50% interest in Kudu.  At the parent company, we closed the Elementum transaction and strengthened our deal pipeline considerably.Disclosures

 

Thoughtful ApproachWhite Mountains seeks to create superior growth in the Company’s intrinsic value per share over the long term. In order to achieve this goal, and in order to steward our owners’ capital effectively, the Board Composition with a Demonstrated Commitmentand management are committed to Refreshment

Assustainability and corporate responsibility. We have made this commitment an integral part of our ongoing commitment to creating a balancedculture and effective Boardpractices. In 2021, with diverse viewpoints, skills, and deep industry expertise related to our Company strategy, Peter Carlson joinedoversight from the Board in 2019. Pete brings over thirty years of accountingDirectors, White Mountains aligned our ESG priorities with both our Company’s business strategy as well as industry and audit experience ininvestor expectations. We significantly enhanced our ESG practices by (i) amending the insurance industry.  He isCompany’s investment policy to address ESG, (ii) adopting a climate change statement, (iii) formalizing the former Executive Vice PresidentBoard’s oversight of ESG matters, and COO of Brighthouse Financial and(iv) further integrating climate-related risks into our risk management practices. In response to feedback from shareholders, we also improved the former Executive Vice President and CAO of MetLife. Our Board has a robust refreshment process and, since 2017, four new independent directors have joined the Board, replacing three long-serving directors. Average tenure now stands at seven years, and women comprise 25%communication of our members.ESG practices by launching an ESG page on our website.

 

Ongoing Dialogue with Shareholders Through Proactive Engagement

 

Engaging with our shareholders remains a high priority.  Over the last year, members of the Board and management reached out to shareholders owning 72% of White Mountains’Mountains’s shares outstanding shares and met with all of those shareholders who requested meetings,accepted a meeting, who represented 26%19% of our shares outstanding. Over the past several years, feedback received from these discussions has helped guide changes to our executive compensation program and furtherto enhance our disclosures about the skills and areas of expertise of our Board the Board’s oversight ofand our risk management and our human capital management initiatives.  In this year’s proxy statement, we have included apractices in general. This year our discussions with shareholders focused on our business strategy, corporate governance, the composition of our Board skills matrix, enhancedand enhancements to our disclosure around Board oversight of ESG and added a section on human capital management.disclosures.

 

In 2021, in response to shareholder feedback, the Board committed to further expanding its diversity by adding a highly qualified and racially or ethnically diverse Board member by year-end 2022. During the year, the Board fulfilled its commitment, increasing gender diversity from 29% to 38% and racial or ethnic diversity from 0% to 13%. The global pandemicBoard is challenging allcommitted to refreshing its membership regularly in order to enhance the diversity of us in 2020, but ourits skills, experience and background and to effectively oversee the Company as it evolves.

Our core principles serveserved us equally well in times of calm and times of uncertainty.  We wish you well2021, as you manage through these turbulent times.we continued to meet the challenges posed by the global pandemic. It is a privilege to serve as your Board, and we greatly value highly your support of White Mountains.

 

Sincerely,

 

The White Mountains Insurance Group Board of Directors

 

Morgan W. Davis, Chair

Peter M. Carlson

Mary C. Choksi

Margaret Dillon

Philip A. Gelston

Edith E. Holiday

G. Manning Rountree

Lowndes A. Smith

Suzanne F. Shank

David A. Tanner

April 6, 2022

 

April 7, 2020

 


Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents

Page

PROXY SUMMARY

2

NOTICE OF 20202022 ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING OF MEMBERS

5

6

PROXY STATEMENT

6

7

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF THE COMPANY’S DIRECTORS

7

8

The Board of Directors

7

8

Corporate Governance

13

14

Voting Securities and Principal Holders Thereof

20

22

Executive Compensation

22

24

CEO Pay Ratio

47

48

Transactions with Related Persons, Promoters and Certain Control Persons

48

49

Equity Compensation Plan Information

49

50

Audit Committee Report

50

51

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

51

52

PROPOSAL 2:  ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

52

53

PROPOSAL 3:  APPROVAL OF THE APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTEREDPUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR 20202022

53

54

OTHER MATTERS

54

OTHER MATTERS

55
ANNEX A: RECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP MEASURES

A-1

 

White Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd. (the “Company”, “Registrant” or “WTM”) is an exempted Bermuda limited liability company whose principal businesses are conducted through its subsidiaries and affiliates. Within this proxy statement, the term “White Mountains” is used to refer to one or more entities within the consolidated organization, as the context requires.

 

White Mountains is engaged in the business of making opportunistic and value-oriented acquisitions of businesses and assets in the insurance, financial services and related sectors, operating these businesses and assets through its subsidiaries and, if and when attractive exit valuations become available, disposing of these businesses and assets.

 

As of December 31, 2021, White Mountains conductsconducted its business primarily in fourfive areas: municipal bond insurance, property and casualty insurance and reinsurance, specialty insurance distribution, capital solutions for asset management firms and other operations. White Mountains’s municipal bond insurance business is conducted through its subsidiary HG Global Ltd. and its reinsurance subsidiary HG Re Ltd. (“HG Re” and, collectively,), (collectively, “HG Global”). HG Global was established to fund the startup of and provide reinsurance, through HG Re, to Build America Mutual Assurance Company (“BAM”), a mutual municipal bond insurance company. White Mountains’s property and casualty insurance and reinsurance business is conducted through its subsidiary Ark Insurance Holdings Limited and its subsidiaries (collectively, “Ark”). White Mountains’s specialty insurance distribution business is conducted through its subsidiary NSM Insurance HoldCo, LLC and its subsidiaries (collectively, “NSM”). White Mountains provides capital solutions for asset management firms through its subsidiary Kudu Investment Management, LLC and its subsidiaries (collectively, “Kudu”). White Mountains’s other operations consist of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary, White Mountains Capital, IncLLC (“WM Capital”), its other intermediate holding companies, its wholly-owned investment management subsidiary, White Mountains Advisors LLC (“WM Advisors”), investment assets managed by WM Advisors, andits interests in MediaAlpha, Inc. (“MediaAlpha”), certain other consolidated and unconsolidated entities and certain other strategic investments.assets. As of December 31, 2021, White Mountains’s reportable segments arewere HG Global/BAM, Ark, NSM, Kudu and Other Operations.  For additional information on our business segments, please refer to the Form 10-K for 2019, which can be found at www.whitemountains.com.

 

The 20202022 Annual General Meeting will be confined to a shareholder vote on the proposals set forth in this Proxy Statement and on such other matters properly brought before the meeting.

For a reconciliation of non-GAAP measures used in this Proxy Statement to their most comparable GAAP measures, see Annex A.


1


Table of Contents

PROXY SUMMARY

 

This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. This summary does not contain all of the information that you should consider. You should read the entire Proxy Statement carefully before voting.

 

Meeting Information and Availability of Proxy Materials

Date and Time:

May 21, 202026, 2022 at 10:8:00 a.m. EasternAtlantic Time

Place:

White Mountains Insurance Group, 23 South Main Street, Suite 3B, Hanover, New Hampshire

Rosewood Bermuda Hotel, 60 Tucker’s Point Drive, Hamilton Parish, Bermuda

Record Date:

April 1, 2020

4, 2022

 

This Proxy Statement and the accompanying proxy card are being distributed and made available to shareholders on or about April 23, 2020.22, 2022.

 

Voting Matters and Board Recommendations

Matter

Our Board’s Recommendation

Proposal 1

Election of twothree directors to Class III with terms ending in 20232025;

Election of one director to Class III with term ending in 2024

For

Proposal 2

Approval of the advisory resolution on executive compensation

For

Proposal 3

Approval of the appointment of PwC as the Company’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2020

2022

For

 

How to Vote

Even if you plan to attend the 2020

Even if you plan to attend the 2022 Annual Meeting of Members in person, we encourage you to vote in advance of the meeting. You may vote using one of the following voting methods. Make sure to have your proxy card or voting instruction form in hand and follow the instructions. Participants who hold shares in a brokerage account, an employee benefit plan, or through a nominee will need to follow instructions on their proxy card, which may include options to vote their shares by telephone or over the internet. You can vote in one of three ways:

 

Record Holders

Beneficial Owners

Vote via the internet

·Go to www.envisionreports.com/WTM

Follow the instructions set forth on the voting instruction form provided by your broker with these proxy materials.

·

Go to www.envisionreports.com/WTM
Vote by telephone

·Call toll free 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within the USA, US territories and Canada

Vote by mail

·Complete, sign, date and return your proxy card in the envelope provided

 

2

Company Performance Highlights

2019 was a strongABVPS and IBVPS were down 7% and 6%, respectively, year for our Company driven by good operating resultsover year.  Excluding the mark-to-market decline in our main businesses and strong absolute investment returns.in MediaAlpha, adjusted book value per share increased 4% for the year, reflecting positive results from our operating businesses.  Highlights of our 20192021 operational and financial performance include:

ü    Deployed $435 million into businesses during theGood underwriting results for Ark in a heavy catastrophe year; grew full year and ended 2019 with undeployed capital at $1.0 billionpremiums 77%

ü    Total investment portfolio returned 20.4% (15.5% excluding the gain from the MediaAlpha transaction)Record $15.6 billion of par insured for BAM, driven by strong investor demand for bond insurance

ü    One-year total shareholder return was 30.2%New highs for pro forma controlled premiums and pro forma EBITDA for NSM

üStrong growth in adjusted EBITDA for Kudu, and completion of five acquisitions during the year

ü   Finished 2019 with book value per shareSuccessful navigation of $1,024 and adjusted book value per share of $1,018, increases of 14% and 15% from the prior yearCOVID-19 pandemic

ü  Had three significant capital deployments: (i) Embrace, a pet insurance MGA acquired by NSM, (ii) the acquisition Significant progress in evolving our ESG practices and increasing diversity on our Board of NSM’s collector car renewal rights and (iii) our buyout of Oaktree’s 50% interest in Kudu

2


Table of ContentsDirectors

 

Governance Highlights

The Company’s commitment to strong corporate governance, effective risk management and strong independent oversight of management by the Board is reflected in our sound governance practices and policies.  Governance highlights include:

ü  Board Composed of 88% Independent Directors
(7 out of 8 Board Members)

ü  Commitment to Board Refreshment (Three New Directors in Past Two Years, 38% of Current Composition)Three Years)

ü  Average Board Tenure is 75 years

ü  Independent Chairman

ü  25% 38% Board Gender Diversity (increased from 29%)

ü   13% Racial or Ethnic Diversity (increased from 0%)

üShareholder Right to Call a Special Meeting at 10%

ü    Annual Board, Committee, and Individual Self-Evaluations

ü    Robust Director and Executive Officer StockShare Ownership Guidelines (5x cash retainer for Directors and 10x salary for CEO and Executive Vice Presidents)EVPs)

 

 


Shareholder Outreach

Shareholder engagement is of great importance to our Board and management team as a means to solicit feedback and to ensure accountability and responsiveness to our shareholders. Building on our 2018 engagement efforts, asAs part of our 20192021 shareholder engagement, we reached out to owners representing 72% of outstanding shares and met with all shareholders who requested meetings,accepted a meeting, who represented 26%19% of outstanding shares. Our Compensation / Nominating & Governance Committee Chair personally led discussions in meetings with shareholders representing 13% of outstanding shares, which were all meetings in which her participation was requested.shares.

 

 

 

The feedbackFeedback from these discussions wasis shared with the Board to helpeach year. In 2019 and 2020, this feedback helped guide changes to our executive compensation plan and further enhanceenhancement of our proxy disclosure.disclosures. In this year’s proxy statement, we have included information on the enhancement of our ESG practices and the launch of an ESG landing page on our website, disclosed the Board’s fulfillment, in 2021, of our commitment to add a Board skills matrix, enhanced our disclosure around Board oversight of ESG,racially or ethnically diverse Director by year-end 2022 and added a sectiondisclosure on human capital management.our director recruitment practices, including consideration of diversity. For further details on the topics discussed with shareholders and the responsive actions taken to the feedback received, please refer to page 1314 of the proxy statement.

3


Table of Contents

 

Executive Compensation Highlights

ü    Formulaic Annual Incentive Plan with Pre-established, Rigorous, and Quantifiable Performance Targets

ü    Half of Annual Long-Term Incentives Delivered in Performance-Based Equity, with a Three-Year Performance Period

ü    Clawback Policy for Annual and Long-Term Incentive Plan

ü    Double-Trigger Change-in-Control Provisions

ü    Over 92%93% of Total Target 20192021 CEO Compensation Was Linked to Metrics Assessing Company or Stock Performance and Therefore Meaningfully “At-Risk”

ü    Over 86%88% of Total Target 20192021 CEO Compensation Delivered in Long-Term Incentives

ü    Thoughtful Peer Group Selection Methodology with Peer Group Used for Variability and Assessment of Appropriate Compensation Structure, Not for Benchmarking Purposes

 

Chief Executive Officer:

 

 

 

Other NEOs:

 

 

 


Enhancing Environmental, Social and Governance Practices and Disclosures

In 2020, with oversight from the Board of Directors, White Mountains embarked on a project designed to improve our ESG practices and disclosures. To strengthen our ESG practices, we undertook a comprehensive gap analysis to identify areas of focus that would align with our Company’s business strategy as well as industry and investor expectations. The full Board had oversight of this process and final approval of the ESG focus areas and actions, which include:

 

·Board’s RoleESG in our Investment Policy: In 2021, we revised our investment policy to address ESG Oversightfactors. We consider ESG factors when (i) making decisions in respect of internally managed portfolios and (ii) selecting external investment managers.

 

·Board Oversight of ESG: In 2021, the charters of the Audit, Finance and Compensation/Nominating & Governance Committees were amended to explicitly include ESG oversight responsibilities. The CNG Committee has responsibility for overseeing the Company’s strategy with respect to corporate governance; environmental stewardship, sustainability and corporate social responsibility; and succession planning for senior executives. The Finance Committee has the responsibility to formulate and approve the investment policy for White Mountains, including the incorporation of ESG considerations. The Audit Committee has responsibility for the oversight of ESG risks as part of its risk management oversight responsibilities.

·Statement on Climate Change: In 2021, we have adopted a corporate statement on climate change, which can be found on page 20.

·ESG in Our Risk Management: Through our risk management activities, we seek to identify and assess major risks that could affect our businesses. We consider ESG risks, such as the impact of climate change and human capital management, in our risk management processes. In 2021, we added information on our risk management practices, including the primary frameworks used to assess risk and our approach to business continuity and the management of cybersecurity risks, to our Company website.

·Communication of Our ESG Practices: To respond to feedback received in our annual shareholder engagement, we have developed an ESG landing page on our corporate website to communicate our practices more effectively. The ESG page contains an overview of how ESG is incorporated into our corporate governance and business ethics, our approach to climate change, our investment management activities, our human capital management, our approach to risk management and our community engagement.

 

The Board is responsible for overseeing the Company’s management of ESG matters.  Following our core operating principle of Thinking Like Owners, we maintain robust and owner-focused corporate governance practices.  With respect to environmental matters, though our business operations do not have a large physical footprint, we strive to make meaningful contributions towards protecting the environment and contributing to our local communities.  As to sustainability, the Board oversees the Company’s corporate culture and reinforces the importance of promoting a respectful and diverse work environment that enables our employees to be productive and feel valued.  We focus on building long-term value for our owners by building enduring partnerships with the management teams and our partners in our various businesses and in the communities in which we operate.  The Board is proud of the Company’s efforts, which can generally be broken down into four main categories: (i) human capital management, (ii) diversity and inclusion, (iii) social impact, and (iv) sustainability.  For further detailsinformation on the enhancement of our Company’s efforts on these categories,ESG practices and disclosures, please refer to page 19 of the proxy statement.19.

 


4


Table of Contents

WHITE MOUNTAINS INSURANCE GROUP, LTD.

 

NOTICE OF 20202022 ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING OF MEMBERS

 

TO BE HELD MAY 21, 202026, 2022

 

April 6, 2022

April 7, 2020

 

Notice is hereby given that the 20202022 Annual General Meeting of Members of White Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd. will be held on Thursday, May 21, 202026, 2022 at 10:8:00 am EasternAtlantic Time at White Mountains Insurance Group, 23 South Main Street, Suite 3B, Hanover, New Hampshire.Rosewood Bermuda Hotel, 60 Tucker’s Point Drive, Hamilton Parish, Bermuda. At this meeting, you will be asked to consider and vote upon the following proposals:

 

1)election of two directors to Class II with terms ending in 2023;

1)election of three directors to Class I with terms ending in 2025; and election of one director to Class III with term ending in 2024;

 

2)approval of the advisory resolution on executive compensation; and

2)approval of the advisory resolution on executive compensation; and

 

3)approval of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) as the Company’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2020.

3)approval of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) as the Company’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2022.

 

The Company’s audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2019,2021, as approved by the Company’s Board of Directors, will be presented at this Annual General Meeting.

 

Shareholders of record of common shares on the record date, Wednesday,Monday, April 1, 2020,4, 2022, (1) who are individuals, may attend and vote at the meeting in person or by proxy or (2) that are corporations or other entities, may have their duly authorized representative attend and vote at the meeting in person or by proxy. A list of all Shareholders entitled to vote at the meeting will be open for public examination during regular business hours beginning on or about April 20, 202022, 2022 at the Company’s registered office located at Clarendon House, 2 Church Street, Hamilton HM 11, Bermuda.

 

By Order of the Board of Directors,

 

Jennifer L. Moyer

Corporate Secretary

 

Shareholders are invited to complete and sign the accompanying proxy card to be returned to White Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd., Proxy Services, c/o Computershare Investor Services, P.O. Box 505008, Louisville, Kentucky 40233-9814, in the envelope provided, whether or not they expect to attend the meeting. Shareholders may also vote their shares by telephone or via the internet in accordance with the instructions on your proxy card.

 


5


Table of Contents

WHITE MOUNTAINS INSURANCE GROUP, LTD.

 

PROXY STATEMENT

 

This Proxy Statement is being furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies on behalf of the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) for the 20202022 Annual General Meeting of Members (the “2020“2021 Annual Meeting”), to be held on Thursday, May 21, 202026, 2022 at White Mountains Insurance Group, 23 South Main Street, Suite 3B, Hanover, New Hampshire.Rosewood Bermuda Hotel, 60 Tucker’s Point Drive, Hamilton Parish, Bermuda.

 

Holders of the Company’s common shares (“Shareholders”), par value $1.00 per share, as of the close of business on Wednesday,Monday, April 1, 2020,4, 2022, the record date, are entitled to vote at the meeting. The solicitation of proxies will be made primarily by mail, and the Proxy Statement and related proxy materials will be distributed to registered Shareholders on or about April 23, 2020.22, 2022.

 

You can ensure that your common shares are properly voted at the meeting by completing, signing, dating and returning the enclosed proxy card in the envelope provided. Shareholders may also vote their shares by telephone or via the internet in accordance with the instructions on your proxy card. Shareholders have the right to appoint another person (who need not be a Shareholder) to represent the Shareholder at the meeting by completing an alternative form of proxy which can be obtained from the Corporate Secretary or by notifying the Inspectors of Election (see page 54)55). Every Shareholder entitled to vote has the right to do so either in person or by one or more persons authorized by a written proxy executed by such Shareholder and filed with the Corporate Secretary. Any proxy duly executed will continue in full force and effect unless revoked by the person executing it in writing or by the filing of a subsequent proxy.

 

Sending in a signed proxy will not affect your right to attend the meeting and vote. If a Shareholder attends the meeting and votes in person, his or her signed proxy is considered revoked.

 

IMPORTANT VOTING INFORMATION

 

If you hold your shares through a broker, bank or other financial institution, in order for your vote to be counted on any matter other than Proposal 3 (the ratification of the selection of PwC as the Company’s auditor for 2020)2022), you must provide specific voting instructions to your broker, bank or financial institution by completing and returning the proxy card or following the instructions provided to you to vote your shares via telephone or the internet. Voting deadlines vary by institution. Please check with your broker, bank or other financial institution for the voting cut-off date for WTM.

 

Your Participation in Voting the Shares You Own Is Important

 

Voting your shares is important to ensure that you have a say in the governance of your company. Please review the proxy materials and follow the instructions on the proxy card to vote your shares. We hope you will exercise your rights and fully participate in your company’s future.

 

More Information Is Available

 

If you have any questions about this rule or the proxy voting process in general, please contact the broker, bank or other financial institution where you hold your shares. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) has information available on the internet at: https://www.investor.gov/system/files/publications/documents/english/sec-guide-to-proxy-brochures.pdf with more information about your voting rights as a shareholder.

 

6



Table of Contents

 

PROPOSAL 1 - -ELECTION OF THE COMPANY’S DIRECTORS

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

 

The Board is divided into three classes (each a “Class”). Each Class serves a three-year term.

 

At the 20202022 Annual General Meeting, G. Manning RountreeMorgan W. Davis, Peter M. Carlson and Mary C. ChoksiSuzanne F. Shank are nominated to be elected to Class III with a term ending in 2023.  Mr. Rountree2025 and Ms. ChoksiDavid A. Tanner is nominated to be elected to Class III with a term ending in 2024. Of the nominees for election at the 2022 Annual General Meeting, Messrs. Davis, Carlson and Tanner were previously elected by Shareholders. Ms. Shank was recommended by Mr. Rountree, the Chief Executive Officer, and approved for nomination to be elected at the 2022 Annual General Meeting by the Compensation/Nominating & Governance Committee.

 

The Board recommends a vote FOR Proposal 1 which calls for the election of the 20202022 nominees.

 

The current members of the Board and terms of each Class are set forth below:

 

 

Director

 

Age

 

Director

Since

Class I - Term ending in 2022

 

 

 

   Morgan W. Davis, Chairman

69

 

2006

   Peter M. Carlson

55

 

2019

   David A. Tanner

61

 

2018

Class II - Term ending in 2020

 

 

 

   G. Manning Rountree*

48

 

2017

   Lowndes A. Smith**

80

 

2003

Class III - Term ending in 2021

 

 

 

   Mary C. Choksi*

69

 

2017

   Philip A. Gelston

67

 

2018

   Edith E. Holiday

68

 

2004

*Nominated to be elected at the 2020 Annual General Meeting to Class II with a term ending in 2023.

**Retiring from the Board at completion of current term, which ends as of the 2020 Annual General Meeting.

 

Director 

 

Age 

 

Director

Since 

Class I - Term ending in 2022   
   Morgan W. Davis, Chairman71 2006
   Peter M. Carlson57 

2019 

   Suzanne F. Shank60 2021
   David A. Tanner63 2018
Class II - Term ending in 2023   
   G. Manning Rountree50 2017
   Mary C. Choksi71 2017
Class III - Term ending in 2024   
   Margaret Dillon62 2021
   Philip A. Gelston69 

2018 

 

The Board is currently comprised of seven independent directors and the Chief Executive Officer.

Board Composition and Refreshment

 

The Company is committed to maintaining a Board with members from a variety of backgrounds to promote diverse, independent thinking. Diversity considerations are an important part of the director search process, and the Company believes that continuallyregularly enhancing and refreshing the makeup of the Board is important. Currently, the boardIn 2021, our Board committed to further expanding its diversity by adding a highly qualified and racially or ethnically diverse Board member by year-end 2022. The Board has 25%fulfilled its commitment, increasing gender diversity with both women also chairing a Committee.from 29% to 38% (3 directors) and racial or ethnic diversity from 0% to 13% (1 director). Out of eight directors, seven are independent, with 100% independence on keythe Audit and Compensation/Nominating & Governance committees. The Company activelyBoard regularly refreshes its membership to enhance the Board to ensure the directors collectively have the optimal mixdiversity of diverseits skills, experience and experiencesbackground to effectively oversee the business as itthe Company evolves.  Our most recent addition in 2019 was Peter Carlson.  Mr. Carlson brings over thirty years of accounting and audit experience and is the former Executive Vice President and COO of Brighthouse Financial.  In December 2019, Mr. Carlson joined MiMedx Group, an industry leader in advanced wound care and an emerging therapeutic biologics company, and became its Chief Financial Officer in March 2020.

 

7



Table of Contents

Director Skills and Qualifications

 

Our Board seeks Directors with a broad range of skills, experience and perspectives in order to ensure effective oversight of the Company’s strategies and risks. The Board believes its members must be willing and able to devote adequate time and effort to Board responsibilities. In evaluating director candidates, the Compensation/Nominating & Governance Committee evaluates attributes such as independence, integrity, expertise, breadth of experience, diversity, knowledge about the Company’s business and industry and ownership in the Company. The skills matrix below highlights our Board’s key skills and qualifications that are directly relevant to our business, strategy and operations. The Board reviews this matrix and the overall Board composition periodically in order to ensure the appropriate balance of diversity, knowledge and experience.

 

Skills and Qualifications

Peter Carlson

Mary Choksi

Morgan Davis

Margaret Dillon

Philip Gelston

Edith Holiday

Manning Rountree

Lowndes SmithSuzanne Shank

David Tanner

Insurance/Financial Services Industry Experience promotes our Board’s ability to define and direct our strategy, evaluate potential transactions, and oversee and strategically guide our management team

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

Senior Leadership Experience enhances our Board’s ability to understand and impact the opportunities and challenges management faces in leading our businesses

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

Financial Reporting Expertise strengthens the Board’s oversight of our financial statements and internal controls

ü

ü

ü

ü

Risk Assessment/Risk Management Experience strengthens the Board’s oversight of complex risks facing the Company

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

Legal/Regulatory Expertise provides the Board with insights into the highly regulated insurance and financial services industries, as well as guidance on these aspects of our mergers and acquisitions activity

ü

ü

ü

Public Company Board Experience equips our Board to maintain robust governance and board practices that are designed to put owners first

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

 

The lack of a checkmark for a particular item does not mean that the director does not possess that qualification, skill or experience, but rather the checkmark indicates that the item is a particularly prominent qualification, skill or experience that the director brings to the Board.

 


8


TableBoard of ContentsDirectors

 

Board of Directors

Class I – To Be Elected to a Term Ending in 20222025

 

Morgan W. Davis

Chairman

Qualifications

 

 

·      Joined in 2006

·      Age: 6971

·      Chairman of the Board

·      Committees: Compensation/Nominating & Governance,

Executive (Chair)

Experience:

·      Appointed Chairman of the Board in March 2017

·      Formerly Managing Director of OneBeacon (2001 to 2005) and served in a variety of capacities for White Mountains subsidiaries (1994 to 2001)

·      Prior to 1994, Mr. Davis had 21 years of experience in the insurance industry, mostly at Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company and INA/Cigna

·      Served as a director of OneBeacon from 2005 until its acquisition by Intact Financial Corporation in September 2017

·      Served as a director of Endurance Specialty Holdings, and as a member of its Finance and Compensation Committees, from 2015 until its acquisition by SOMPO Holdings, Inc. in March 2017

·      Serves on the Board of Trustees of Lipscomb University and on the Board of Directors forof the United States African Development Foundation

 

Mr. Davis has extensive executive and board-level experience gained over the course of his more than 45-year career in the property and casualty insurance industry.

 

Select Board Service:

·Compare.com (Private)

·MediaAlpha (Private)

·        NSM Insurance Group (Private)

 

Peter M. Carlson



Qualifications

 

 

 

·      Joined in 2019

·      Age: 5557

·      Committees: Audit (Chair), Executive

Experience:

·      Chief Financial Officer of MiMedx Group, a biopharmaceutical company; joined December 2019

·      Formerly served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Brighthouse Financial, a U.S. annuity and life insurance company that spun off from MetLife, from 2017 to 2018

·      Served as Executive Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer at MetLife from 2009 to 2017

·      Formerly at Wachovia Corporation from 2002 to 2009, where he served as Executive Vice President and Corporate Controller from 2006 to 2008

·      Joined Wachovia after fifteen years at Arthur Andersen, where he served as an audit partner working in financial services, manufacturing, commercial services and distribution

·      Serves as a Trustee of Wake Forest University

 

Mr. Carlson has extensive accounting and auditing experience gained over the course of his 30-year career in the insurance and financial services industries.

9


10

Table of Contents

 

David A. TannerSuzanne F. Shank

Qualifications

 

 

·Joined in 2021

·Age: 60

·Committees: Compensation/Nominating & Governance, Finance

Experience:

·President, CEO and co-founder of Siebert Williams Shank & Co., LLC (formerly Siebert Cisneros Shank & Co., LLC), a full service investment banking and financial services company established in 1996

·Prior to her financial services career, she worked as a structural engineer at General Dynamics Corporation

·Serves as Board Member of Skillman Foundation, Kresge Foundation, Spelman College and Global Citizen

Ms. Shank has extensive experience in investment banking and municipal finance gained over the course of almost 35 years in the financial services industry

Select Board Service:

·Consumers Energy Company - Audit Committee (Public)

·Rocket Companies, Inc. - Audit Committee (Public)

Class I – To Be Elected to Class III and to a Term Ending in 2024

David A. TannerQualifications

 

 

·      Joined in 2018

·     Age: 6163

·      ViceDeputy Chairman of the Board

·      Committees: Audit, Finance

Experience:

·      Appointed ViceDeputy Chairman of the Board in February 2020

·      Managing Director of Three Mile Capital LLC, a private investment company

·Partner at Rosemark Capital, an investor in and owner of media and marketing technology companies

·      Served as the Managing Director of Arlon Group LLC and as Executive Vice President and a member of the Management Committee of Continental Grain Company from 2006 to 2017

·      Served as a Founder and Managing Principal of Quadrangle Group, LLC from 2000 to 2006

·      Served as Managing Director at Lazard Freres & Co. and Managing Principal at Lazard Capital Partners from 1998 to 2000

·      Serves as Chairman of the Board of the New York University School of Law, Trustee of New York University, Trustee and Chair Emeritus of Montefiore Medicine Academic Health System, Director of Lawyers for Children, Director of The Carroll and Milton Petrie Foundation and a member of the Council on Foreign Relations

 

Mr. Tanner has extensive executive and board-level service and financial expertise gained over the course of over 3035 years in the financial services industry.

 

Select Board Service:

·      Northeast Bancorp (Public)

10


Table of Contents

 

11

Class II – To Be Elected to a Term Ending in 2023

 

G. Manning RountreeMary C. Choksi

QualificationsQualification

 

 

·      Joined in 2017

·      Age: 4871

·      Committees: Finance (Chair), Executive Finance

Experience:

·Joined White Mountains in 2004

·Prior to CEO appointment in 2017, served as President of White Mountains Capital and President of White Mountains Advisors

·Senior Vice President and Head of Corporate Development, Putnam Investments (2002-2004)

·Associate, McKinsey & Company (1999-2002)

Mr. Rountree has extensive management and financial expertise gained over the course of his career in the investment and insurance industries.

Select Board Service:

·Admiral Group, plc (Public)

·Build America Mutual Assurance Co (Private)

·Various WTM portfolio companies (Private)

Class III – To Be Elected to a Term Ending in 2023

Mary C. Choksi

Qualifications

·Joined in 2017

·Age: 69

·Committees: Executive, Finance (Chair)

Experience:

·      Founding Partner (and Senior Managing Director/Senior Advisor until February 2017) of Strategic Investment Group, an investment management enterprise founded in 1987 which designs and implements global investment strategies for institutional and individual investors

·      Founder and Managing Director of Emerging Markets Management LLC until May 2011

·      Prior to 1987, worked in the Pension Investment Division of the World Bank

·      Serves as a Trustee of Washington and Lee University

 

Ms. Choksi has extensive executive and board-level service and investment management expertise gained over the course of her 40 years in the financial services industry.

 

Select Board Service:

·Avis Budget Group - Compensation Committee (Public)

·      Omnicom Group - Audit and Compensation Committees (Public)

·      Franklin Templeton Mutual Funds (36(24 investment companies) - Audit Committee

G. Manning RountreeQualifications

 

·Joined in 2017

·Age: 50

·Committees: Finance, Executive

Experience:

·Joined White Mountains in 2004

·Prior to CEO appointment in 2017, served as President of White Mountains Capital and President of White Mountains Advisors

·Senior Vice President and Head of Corporate Development, Putnam Investments (2002-2004)

·Associate, McKinsey & Company (1999-2002)

Mr. Rountree has extensive management and financial expertise gained over the course of his career in the investment and insurance industries.

Select Board Service:

·Build America Mutual Assurance Co. (Private) - Chairman

·Various WTM portfolio companies (Private)

 

11



Table of Contents

Class III – Term Ending in 20212024

Philip A. GelstonMargaret Dillon

Qualifications

 

·Joined in 2021

·Age: 62

·Committees: Audit, Compensation/Nominating & Governance

Experience:

·Served as Executive Vice President and Chief Customer Officer, US Consumer Markets, for Liberty Mutual Insurance Company from 2014 to 2017

·Served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Personal Lines Insurance, for Liberty Mutual Insurance Company from 2002 to 2014

·Served as Controller, Personal Markets, for Liberty Mutual Insurance Company from 1998 to 2001

·Served in various technology and finance roles for International Paper from 1984 to 1993

Ms. Dillon has extensive executive, financial, and property and casualty insurance expertise gained over the course of over 30 years in the insurance and manufacturing industries.

Select Board Service:

·Guidewire Software - Audit Committee (Public)

Philip A. GelstonQualifications

 

 

·      Joined in 2018

·      Age: 6769

·      Committees: Audit, Compensation/ Nominating &
Governance (Chair), Executive

Experience:

·      Joined Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP in 1978, became a partner in 1984, and retired in December 2017

·      Currently a member of Cravath’s Office of General Counsel

·      Has extensive experience in mergers and acquisitions, joint ventures and general corporate counseling, encompassing complicated negotiated transactions, hostile transactions (both offense and defense), cross border transactions, activist defense, and advising boards and senior executives, particularly on complex transactions, corporate governance and managing crisis situations

·      Serves as a Trustee for the Friends of Bronx PreparatoryDemocracy Prep New York Charter SchoolSchools

 

Mr. Gelston has extensive legal and management expertise gained over the course of his 40-year career in the legal field.

Edith E. Holiday

Qualifications

·Joined in 2004

·Age: 68

·Committees: Compensation/ Nominating &
Governance (Chair), Executive

Experience:

·Served as the President, Secretary and Treasurer of Comcast TW  Holdings, Inc. from 2006 to 2007

·Former Operating Trustee for TWE Holdings I and II Trusts from 2002 to 2007

·Served as Assistant to the President of the United States and Secretary of the Cabinet from 1990 to 1993

·Served as General Counsel to the United States Treasury Department from 1989 to 1990

Ms. Holiday has extensive board-level experience across diverse industries and significant experience with the U.S. Federal government.

 

Select Board Service:

·Canadian National Railway Co – Audit Committee (Public)

·Franklin Templeton Mutual Funds (36 investment companies)

·Hess Corporation (Public)

·Santander Consumer USA (Public)

 


12


Table of ContentsCORPORATE GOVERNANCE

 

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEWe are committed to the ethical conduct of our business. This commitment is reflected in our corporate governance and in our corporate values and culture. Our corporate governance helps us to mitigate and manage risks by providing clear lines of oversight and responsibility for management and the Board. We review and seek to improve our corporate governance regularly.

 

The Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines spell out our overall approach towards corporate governance. The Company also has a Code of Business Conduct that applies to all directors, officers and employees in carrying out their responsibilities to, and on behalf of, the Company. No waivers of the Code of Business Conduct were requested of, or granted by, the Board for any director or executive officer during 2019.2021.

 

The Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Business Conduct are available at our website, www.whitemountains.com. These documents are available in print, free of charge, to any shareholder upon request.

The Board

 

The primary responsibility of the Board is to oversee and review management’s performance in order to advance the long-term interests of the Company and its shareholders. The day-to-day management of the Company, including preparation of financial statements and short-term and long-term strategic planning, is the responsibility of management.  The primary responsibility of the Board is to oversee and review management’s performance of these functions in order to advance the long-term interests of the Company and its shareholders.

 

In fulfilling thistheir responsibility, directors must exercise common sense business judgment and act in what they reasonably believe to be in the best interests of the Company. Directors keep themselves informed by discussing matters with the CEO, other key executives and our principal external advisors, such as legal counsel, outside auditors and other consultants, by reading the reports and other materials that management sends them regularly, and by participating actively in Board and committee meetings. Directors are entitled to rely on the honesty and integrity of senior management and the Company’s outside advisors and auditors. However, it is the Board’s responsibility to establish that they have a reasonable basis for such reliance by ensuring that they have a strong foundation for trusting the integrity, honesty and undivided loyalty of the senior management team upon whom they are relying and the independence and expertise of outside advisors and auditors.

 

Mr. Davis, an independent director, serves as Chairman of the Board. At meetings of the Board, Mr. Davis presides over a separate session of non-management directors without Company management present. In addition to being led by an independent Board Chair, the Board is comprised of directors that, together, are knowledgeable and experienced in the Company’s business. The Board is satisfied that the current structure provides strong oversight of the Company’s affairs.

Shareholder Engagement

Shareholder engagement is of great importance to our Board and management team as a means to solicit feedback and to ensure accountability and responsiveness to our shareholders. Building onWe recognize the value in maintaining open lines of communication with our 2018 engagement efforts, asshareholders and consider our robust annual shareholder outreach program to be an important governance tool. In these meetings, we address any trends, topics or issues that participating shareholders wish to discuss with us. As part of our 2019 shareholder engagement efforts in 2021, we reached out to shareholders owning 72% of outstanding shares and met with all shareholders who requested meetings,accepted a meeting, who represented 26%19% of outstanding shares. Our Compensation / Nominating & Governance Committee Chair personally led discussions in meetings with shareholders representing 13% of outstanding shares, which were all meetings where her participation was requested.

13


Table of Contentsshares.

 

These discussions centered around our business strategy, corporate governance (including Board diversity), executive compensation program composition of our board, and board oversight of risk management.enhancements to our ESG disclosures. More specifically, we discussed our significant business achievements in 2021, the evolution of our ESG practices, our progress on Board diversity, and our compensation philosophy and metrics. Our shareholders continued to express support for the changes we made to our compensation program in 2019, our continued board refreshment with the appointment in 2019 of our newest independent director, insurance industry veteran Peter Carlson, and our environmental and sustainability practices.  The 2019 changes to our compensation program were towhich included (i) makemaking our annual bonus program for executive officers entirely formulaic with a pre-established, rigorous and quantifiable performance target relevant for our Company and industry and (ii) adopt adopting


share ownership guidelines for our executive officers. Our shareholders were overwhelmingly supportive of our executive compensation programs, including the performance metrics usedapproach in our 2019 annual bonus program and 2019-2021 long-term incentives, and our patient capital redeployment efforts.2021.

 

 

Our Annual Investor Meeting provides another opportunity for us to engage with our shareholders. The Company will hold its 2022 Annual Investor Meeting on Friday, June 10, 2022. Please refer to the Company’s website for further details.

Management and the Board recognize the value of direct shareholder input and take our shareholders’ views into account in managing or overseeing the Company. Shareholder feedback is regularly communicated to our full Board, and the input we received directly informed enhancements implemented to our executive compensation program in 2019, as well as the expanded disclosuredisclosures relating to corporate governance, ESG and board diversity in this year’sour proxy statement (e.g., Board’s Role in ESG Oversight and Director Skills and Qualifications with an individual skills matrix).

statement.

Director Independence

 

The Board has determined that a majority of the Company’s current directors are independent, as defined in Section 303A of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) Listed Company Manual. Those directors determined to be independent are Messrs. Carlson, Davis, Gelston, Smith and Tanner and Mmes. Choksi, Dillon and Holiday.Shank. For a director to be independent, the Board must determine that the director has no relationship with the Company (other than being a director or shareholder of the Company or its subsidiaries) or has only immaterial relationships with the Company. The Company does not apply categorical standards as a basis for determining director independence. Accordingly, the Board considers all relevant facts and circumstances, on a case-by-case basis, in making an independence determination.

 

The Board notes no current relationships (other than being directors or shareholders) with Messrs. Carlson, Gelston Smith and Tanner or Mmes. Choksi, Dillon and Holiday.Shank. The Board notes a relationship with Mr. Davis, as disclosed herein under “Director Compensation”, that it concluded was immaterial and did not impair his independence. In making its independence determinations, the Board considers all such relationships in light of NYSE standards as well as the attributes it believes should be possessed by independent-minded directors. Those attributes include the relative impact of the transactions to the director’s personal finances, the perceived degree of dependence by the director or the Company upon the relationship or transactions continuing in the future and whether the transactions were on terms that were reasonable and competitive.

Board Meetings and Committees; Annual Meeting Attendance

 

During 2019,2021, the following meetings of the Board were held: fourfive meetings of the full Board, nineeight meetings of the Audit Committee, five meetings of the Compensation/Nominating & Governance Committee one meeting of the Performance Compensation Subcommittee and four meetings of the Finance Committee. During 2019,2021, each director attended more than 75% of the aggregate of: (1) the total number of meetings of the Board (held during the period for which he or she has been a director); and (2) the total number of meetings held by all committees of the Board on which he or she served.

 

It is White Mountains practice that all directors are invited to, receive materials for and generally attend all Committee meetings. In addition, each Committee Chair provides regular updates to the full Board regarding Committee activities.

Directors are encouraged to attend annual meetings.the Annual General Meeting and our Annual Investor Meeting. All of the Company’s directors were in attendance at the 20192021 Annual General Meeting, which was held on May 23, 2019.27, 2021, and the 2021 Annual Investor Meeting, which was held on June 4, 2021.

 

14



Table of Contents

Committees of the Board

 

Compensation/Nominating & Governance Committee

 

Met five times during fiscal year 20192021

 

Current Committee Members:

·      Edith HolidayPhil Gelston (Chair)

·      Morgan Davis

·      Philip GelstonMargaret Dillon

·Suzanne Shank

Primary Responsibilities

·      Review and make recommendations on director compensation

·      Discharge the Board’s responsibilities relating to the compensation of executives

·      Oversee the administration of the Company’s (and, to the extent the Committee deems appropriate, the major subsidiaries of the Company) compensation plans, in particular the incentive compensation and equity-based plans

·      Prepare the annual report on executive compensation required by the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) to be included in the Company’s annual proxy statement or annual report on Form 10-K, as applicable

·      Identify individuals qualified to become Board members and recommend such individuals to the Board for nomination for election to the Board

·      Make recommendations to the Board concerning committee appointments

·      Develop, recommend and annually review corporate governance guidelines applicable to the Company and oversee corporate governance matters

·      Oversee the Company’s strategy with respect to environmental stewardship, sustainability and corporate social responsibility

·Review the CEO’s short-term and long-term succession plans for the CEO and other senior management positions and report to the Board on succession planning

·Oversee the evaluation of the Board and management

 

The Compensation/Nominating & Governance Committee Charter, which outlines the duties and responsibilities of the Compensation/Nominating & Governance Committee, is available at www.whitemountains.com. The Compensation/Nominating & Governance Committee Charter is available in print, free of charge, to any shareholder upon request.

 

Independence

 

The Board has determined that each current member of the Compensation/Nominating & Governance Committee satisfies applicable NYSE requirements.

 

 

15



Table of Contents

Audit Committee

 

Met nineeight times during fiscal year 20192021

 

Current Committee Members:

·      Lowndes SmithPeter Carlson (Chair)

·      Peter CarlsonMargaret Dillon

·      Philip Gelston

·      David Tanner

Primary Responsibilities

·      Assist with Board oversight of the:

-      Integrity of the Company’s financial statements;

-      Qualifications and independence of the independent auditors;

-      Performance of the internal audit function and the independent auditors; and

-      Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements

·      Provide an avenue of communication among the independent auditors, management, the internal auditors and the Board

·      Approve certain related or affiliated person transactions and review disclosures thereof

·      Prepare the Audit Committee Report

·      Discuss with management the Company’s policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management, including the Company’s major financial risk exposures and risks related to environmental, social and governance matters, and the steps management has taken to monitor and control those exposures

·      Receive a report, at least annually, on company-wide risks

·      Meet individually in private session with the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, General Counsel, General Auditor, Chief Accounting Officer, and the independent auditors at its quarterly meetings

 

The Audit Committee Charter, which outlines the duties and responsibilities of the Audit Committee, is available at www.whitemountains.com. The Audit Committee Charter is available in print, free of charge, to any shareholder upon request.

 

Financial Expertise and Independence

 

The Board has determined that, of the persons on the Audit Committee, at a minimum Mr. SmithCarlson meets the requirements of being an Audit Committee Financial Expert as defined in Item 407(d) of Regulation S-K of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).

 

The Board has also determined that each current member of the Audit Committee satisfies applicable NYSE requirements as well as the separate independence standards set forth by the SEC.

 

Report

The Audit Committee Report is included in this Proxy Statement beginning on page 50.51.

Finance Committee

 

Met four times during fiscal year 20192021

 

Current Committee Members:

·       Mary Choksi (Chair)

·       Manning Rountree

·       Lowndes SmithSuzanne Shank

·       David Tanner

Primary Responsibilities

·      Formulate the Company’s investment policy and investment guidelines

·      Review the performance and asset allocation of the Company’s investment portfolio on a regular basis

·      Monitor the capital, debt, and corporate structure of the Company

·      In coordination with the Audit Committee, review the adequacy of risk management, including with respect to new business opportunities outside of traditional property and casualty insurance and reinsurance

 

16


17 

Table of Contents

Interlocks and Insider Participation

 

No member of the Compensation/Nominating & Governance Committee was an employee of the Registrant during the last fiscal year or has served as an officer of the Registrant.

Consideration of Director Nominees

 

General Criteria and Process for Selection of Director Candidates. Our Compensation/Nominating & Governance Committee regularly reviews the individual and collective skills and other attributes of Board members. In identifying and evaluating director candidates, the Compensation/Nominating & Governance Committee does not set specific criteria for directors. Under its Charter, the Committee is responsible for determining desired Board skills and evaluating attributes such as independence, integrity, expertise, breadth of business and life experience, diversity and knowledge about the Company’s business and industry and ownership interest in the Company.  In selecting director candidates, the Company seeks a diversity of skills, backgrounds and experience. Directors must be willing to devote adequate time and effort to Board responsibilities. As set forth in the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines and its Charter, the Committee is responsible for recommending director candidates to the Board.

The Compensation/Nominating & Governance Committee has the authority to retain search firms to be used to identify director candidates. During 2021, a third-party search firm helped to identify and review director candidates, and one of our new directors in 2021 was recommended by our search firm. We inform any director search firm that may be retained of our preference to include highly qualified candidates who have diverse identities or backgrounds (including in respect of gender or gender identity, race, ethnicity or sexual identity) in the pool of potential candidates it presents for consideration by the Board.

 

Consideration of Diversity in Selection of Director Candidates. We believe that a variety of perspectives, opinions, backgrounds, business and life experiences and tenure among the members of the Board enhances the Board’s ability to perform its duties and effectively oversee the Company’s business. In the selection of director candidates, we welcome a diversity of skills, backgrounds, business and life experiences, identities and viewpoints. The Board enhanced its diversity in 2021 with the addition of two female directors (Mmes. Dillon and Shank) and one racially diverse director (Ms. Shank) and remains committed to further increasing its diversity.

Consideration of Director Candidates Nominated by Shareholders. The Company has not adopted a specific policy regarding consideration of director candidates from shareholders. Shareholders who wish to recommend candidates for consideration by the Committee may submit their nominations in writing to the Corporate Secretary at the address provided in this Proxy Statement. The Committee may consider such shareholder recommendations when it evaluates and recommends candidates to the Board for submission to shareholders at each annual general meeting. In addition, shareholders may nominate director candidates for election without consideration by the Committee by complying with the eligibility, advance notice and other provisions of our Bye-laws as described below.

Procedures for Nominating Director Candidates. Under the Company’s Bye-laws, nominations for the election of directors may be made by the Board or by any shareholder entitled to vote for the election of directors (a “Qualified Shareholder”). A Qualified Shareholder may nominate persons for election as directors only if written notice of such Qualified Shareholder’s intent to make such nomination is delivered to the Secretary not later than: (1) with respect to an election to be held at an annual general meeting, 90 days prior to the anniversary date of the immediately preceding annual general meeting or not later than 10 days after notice or public disclosure of the date of the annual general meeting is given or made available to Qualified Shareholders, whichever date is earlier, and (2) with respect to an election to be held at a special general meeting for the election of directors, the close of business on the seventh day following the date on which notice of such meeting is first given to Qualified Shareholders. Each such notice shall set forth: (a) the name and address of the Qualified Shareholder who intends to make the nomination and of the person or persons to be nominated; (b) a representation that the Qualified Shareholder is a holder of record of common shares entitled to vote at such meeting and intends to appear in person or by proxy at the meeting to nominate the person or persons specified in the notice; (c) a description of all arrangements or understandings between the Qualified Shareholder and each such candidate and any other person or persons (naming such person or persons) pursuant to which the nomination or nominations are to be made by the Qualified Shareholder; (d) such other information regarding each candidate proposed by such Qualified Shareholder as would have been required to be included in a proxy statement filed pursuant to the proxy rules of the SEC had each such candidate been nominated, or intended to be nominated, by the Board; and (e) the consent of each such candidate to serve as a director of the Company if so elected.

 

17



Table of Contents

Shareholder Communications

 

Shareholders, employees and others interested in communicating directly with the Board, any of the Board’s Committees or any individual member of the Board should write to the addressee, c/o the Corporate Secretary, at the address presented under “Available Information” (which appears on page 55)56).

Succession Planning

One of the top responsibilities of the Board is to ensure continuity in White Mountains’s senior leadership by overseeing the development of executive talent and planning for the efficient succession of the CEO and other senior executives. Among the responsibilities of the Compensation/Nominating & Governance Committee is to review, at least annually, the CEO’s short-term and long-term succession plans for the CEO and other senior management positions and report to the Board on succession planning. Our goal is to develop well-rounded and experienced leaders. The Company ensures that our executives have the necessary internal or external training and mentoring they need to develop professionally. Our high potential executives are regularly challenged with additional responsibilities and positioned to interact more frequently with the Board so Directors can get to know and assess them.

 

Risk Oversight

 

The Board, directly and through its Committees, plays an active role in the oversight of the Company’s risk management. The subject of risk management is a recurring agenda item, for which the Board regularly receives reports from management on capital, investments, and operations, including the risks associated with each and the steps management is taking to manage those risks. The Board also discusses with management the Company’s business strategy, risk appetite and appropriate levels of risk.risk, as well as considerations of ESG risks, such as the impact of climate change, human capital management and cybersecurity threats.

 

The Board’s committees are assigned oversight responsibility for particular areas of risk. For example, the Audit Committee receives a report, at least annually, on company-wide risks which considers operational, financial, legal, compliance, cyber and reputational risks, as well as climate risks and sustainability matters. The Compensation/Nominating & Governance Committee oversees risk related to executive compensation plans and implementation.implementation, corporate governance, succession planning, environmental stewardship, sustainability and corporate social responsibility. The Finance Committee oversees the risks related to managing the Company’s investment portfolio. Full Board meetings and individual Committee meetings are scheduled so as not to overlap and all directors are encouraged to attend all committee meetings, allowing for every director to participate and provide guidance regarding any risk concerns.

 

18


TableMore information about the Company’s approach to risk management, including the primary frameworks used to assess risk and our approach to business continuity and the management of Contentscybersecurity risks, is available on the ESG landing page on our Company website (www.whitemountains.com/esg/).

 

Enhancing Environmental, Social and Governance Practices and Disclosures

White Mountains invests with the goal of creating superior growth in the Company’s intrinsic value per share over the long term.  In order to achieve this goal, and in order to steward our owners’ capital effectively, the Board and management are committed to sustainability and corporate responsibility. We have made this commitment an integral part of our culture and practices.

In 2020, with oversight from the Board of Directors, White Mountains embarked on a project designed to improve our ESG practices and disclosures. We identified ESG priorities that align with both our Company’s business strategy as well as industry and investor expectations. Our key areas of focus included (i) amending the Company’s investment policy to address ESG, (ii) adopting a climate change statement, (iii) formalizing the Board’s Roleoversight of ESG matters, and (iv) further integrating climate-related risks into our risk management practices. In response to feedback from shareholders, we also committed to improve the communication of our ESG practices by launching an ESG page within our corporate website.

19 

Our ESG Practices

To strengthen our ESG practices, we undertook a comprehensive gap analysis to identify areas to improve that would align with our business strategy as well as industry and investor expectations. ESG topics were prioritized based on relevance, applicability and feasibility of implementation. The full Board had oversight of this process and final approval of the ESG focus areas and actions, which included:

·ESG in Our Investment Policy: In 2021, we revised our investment policy to address ESG factors. We consider ESG factors when (i) making investment decisions in respect of internally managed portfolios and (ii) selecting external investment managers.

·Board Oversight of ESG: In 2021, the charters of the Audit, Finance and Compensation/Nominating & Governance Committees were amended to explicitly include ESG oversight responsibilities. The CNG Committee has responsibility for overseeing the Company’s strategy with respect to corporate governance; environmental stewardship, sustainability and corporate social responsibility; and succession planning for senior executives. The Finance Committee has responsibility for formulating and approving the investment policy for White Mountains, including the incorporation of ESG considerations. The Audit Committee has responsibility for the oversight of ESG risks as part of its risk management oversight responsibilities.

·Statement on Climate Change: In 2021, we adopted a corporate statement on climate change as follows:

“Climate change contributes to higher temperatures, sea level rise and more extreme weather events including droughts, heavy storms, wildfires and stronger hurricanes.  We do not manufacture products that produce carbon, nor do we otherwise meaningfully impact the environment through our operations. However, as the owner and operator of a diversified group of businesses in insurance, financial services and related sectors, we are exposed to risks that are exacerbated by climate change, in particular in our property and casualty insurance/reinsurance and municipal bond guaranty businesses.  Accordingly, in our risk management processes, we consider the potential impact of the effects of climate change. 

We also believe that we have an important role to play as a responsible corporate citizen on climate change matters. Our corporate philanthropy reflects our commitment to the environment.” 

·ESG in Our Risk Management: Through our risk management activities, we seek to identify and assess major risks that could affect our businesses. We consider ESG risks, such as the impact of climate change and human capital management, in our risk management processes. In 2021, we added information on our risk management practices, including the primary frameworks used to assess risk and our approach to business continuity and the management of cybersecurity risks, to our Company website.

·Communication of Our ESG Practices: To respond to feedback received in our annual shareholder engagement, we have developed an ESG landing page on our corporate website to communicate our practices more effectively. The ESG page contains an overview of how ESG is incorporated into our corporate governance and business ethics, our approach to climate change, our investment management activities, our human capital management, our approach to risk management and our community engagement.

More detailed information on the practices outlined above is available on the ESG Oversightlanding page on our Company website (www.whitemountains.com/esg/).

Human Capital Management and Diversity & Inclusion

Our strength lies in our people, and we proactively support each employee’s well-being and development. Our Board receives periodic reporting on employee satisfaction and concerns and interacts with employees across our organization. We have an inclusive, team-oriented culture in which all employees are treated with respect. Under the guidelines of our Code of Business Conduct, we are firmly committed to providing equal employment opportunities. In our recruiting practices at our parent company, we require that a diverse slate of candidates be considered for every open position. We deeply value diversity of backgrounds, experiences and ideas, which we believe fosters more engaging discussions, stronger collaboration and better company performance. We invest in the professional development of our workforce and are committed to the long-term development of our workforce and the cultivation of our next generation of leaders. To support the advancement of our


employees at the parent company, we endeavor to strengthen their qualifications by providing access to training in financial skills, effective communication and institutional knowledge. Our parent company mentoring program encourages new relationships and additional career support opportunities, and our Educational Assistance Program funds external professional development opportunities to further enhance job-related skills.

Throughout the unique challenges of 2020 and 2021, our commitment to the health and safety of our employees and their families has been our guiding priority. To support our employees during this time, we expanded and encouraged remote work, introduced protocols and practices that emphasized employee well-being, regularly solicited feedback from our employees and ensured frequent senior leadership communication.

Corporate Social Responsibility

 

The BoardWhite Mountains is responsible for overseeingcommitted to the Company’s managementcommunities in which we live and work, and many of ESG matters.  Following our core operating principle of Thinking Like Owners, we maintain robust and owner-focused corporate governance practices.  With respect to environmental matters, while our business operations do not have a large physical footprint, we strive to make meaningful contributions towards protecting the environment and contributing to our local communities.  As to sustainability, the Board oversees the Company’s corporate culture and reinforces the importance of promoting a respectful and diverse work environment that enables our employees to be productiveactively support non-profit organizations in their respective communities. Their focus is mirrored by our corporate philanthropy efforts at our parent company, which include a charitable matching gift program, corporate support for environmental and feel valued.  We focus on building long-term value for our owners by building enduring partnerships with the management teams and our partners in our various businesses andsocial causes in the communities in which we operate.  The Board is proudoperate, and partnerships with high quality organizations focused on issues of the Company’s efforts, which can generally be broken down into four main categories:diversity & inclusion.

 


Human Capital Management

Our strength lies in our people and we proactively support each employee’s entire well-being and development.  Our Board receives periodic reporting on employee satisfaction and concerns and interacts with employees at all levels of the organization.

Thinking like owners, our focus is on the long-term development of our workforce and cultivating our next generation of leaders.  Via our Education Assistance Policy, we support the professional development of our employees so that they can maintain and improve job-related skills.  To further support our workforce both at and outside of the office, we provide employees and their household members free access to our Employee Assistance Program (EAP) to help with a wide range of personal, family or workplace concerns.

Diversity and Inclusion

Our success is underpinned by a commitment to high standards and teamwork.  Under the guidelines of our Code of Business Conduct, we are firmly committed to providing equal employment opportunities and cultivating a culture in which all employees are treated with respect.  We deeply value diversity of backgrounds, experiences and ideas, which we believe helps foster more fruitful discussions, stronger collaboration and better company performance.

Social Impact

Our philosophy and practice is to act as responsible members of society, supporting select charitable organizations and activities in the local communities where our employees live and work.  We do this through our Giving With Impact program, an employee-led annual event, and through our matching gifts programs, which encourage employees to support educational or charitable organizations of their choice.

Sustainability

While our operating businesses do not have a large physical footprint, we strive to make an impact where we can.  Through our operating business Build America Mutual (BAM), the BAM GreenStar designations highlight qualifying bonds sold by U.S. municipal bond issuers for infrastructure projects that provide clear environmental benefits.  The criteria for identifying these bonds align with the International Capital Markets Association’s Green Bond Principles, and eligible projects include investments in sustainable water and wastewater systems, renewable energy and the construction or renovation of energy efficient buildings, among others.

Part of our charitable giving program also includes donations to environmentally-focused and conservation-focused organizations.  We have several ongoing annual donations to organizations focused on land conservation, education, research and avian wildlife rehabilitation.  In addition, we have semi-annual volunteer days supported by our employees.  For more information on the organizations that we support, visit the community engagement page on our website at https://www.whitemountains.com/community-engagement/.

19


Table of Contents

VOTING SECURITIES AND PRINCIPAL HOLDERS THEREOF

 

Voting Rights of Shareholders

 

As of April 1, 2020,2022, there were 3,128,6442,994,162 common shares outstanding. Shareholders of record of common shares shall be entitled to one vote per common share, provided that if, and so long as, the votes conferred by “Controlled” common shares (as defined below) of any person constitute ten percent (10%) or more of the votes conferred by the outstanding common shares of the Company, each outstanding common share comprised in such Controlled common shares shall confer only a fraction of a vote that would otherwise be applicable according to the following formula:

 

[(T divided by 10)-1] divided by C

 

Where: “T” is the aggregate number of votes conferred by all the outstanding common shares; and “C” is the number of votes conferred by the Controlled common shares of such person.

 

“Controlled” common shares in reference to any person means:

 

(1)all common shares directly, indirectly, or constructively owned by such person within the meaning of Section 958 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, of the United States; and

(1)all common shares directly, indirectly, or constructively owned by such person within the meaning of Section 958 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, of the United States; and

 

(2)all common shares directly, indirectly, or constructively owned by any person or “group” of persons within the meaning of Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder; provided that this clause (ii) shall not apply to (a) any person (or any group that includes any person) that has been exempted from the provisions of this clause or (b) any person or group that the Board, by the affirmative vote of at least seventy-five percent (75%) of the entire Board, may exempt from the provisions of this clause.

(2)all common shares directly, indirectly, or constructively owned by any person or “group” of persons within the meaning of Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder; provided that this clause (ii) shall not apply to (a) any person (or any group that includes any person) that has been exempted from the provisions of this clause or (b) any person or group that the Board, by the affirmative vote of at least seventy-five percent (75%) of the entire Board, may exempt from the provisions of this clause.

 

The limitations set forth above do not apply to any Shareholder which is a “Byrne Entity” (as defined below) for any matter submitted to the vote of Shareholders, except with respect to the election of directors. “Byrne Entity” means any foundation or trust established by John J. Byrne, Patrick Byrne, and any associate or affiliate of any of them (or any group of which any of them is a part), as defined under Section 13(d) of the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

If, as a result of giving effect to the foregoing provisions or otherwise, the votes conferred by the Controlled common shares of any person would otherwise represent 10% or more of the votes conferred by all the outstanding common shares, the votes conferred by the Controlled common shares of such person shall be reduced in accordance with the foregoing provisions. Such process shall be repeated until the votes conferred by the Controlled common shares of each person represent less than 10% of the votes conferred by all common shares.

 

20



Table of Contents

 

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners

 

To the knowledge of the Company, there was no person or entity beneficially owning more than 5% of the common shares outstanding as of April 1, 2020,2022, except as shown below.

 

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner

Amount of
Beneficial
Ownership

 

Percent of
Class

Amount of
Beneficial
Ownership
 Percent of
Class

 

 

 

 

The Vanguard Group 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355

316,058

  (a)

10.1 %

279,362  (a)9.3 %

Wellington Management Group, LLP 280 Congress Street, Boston, MA 02210

247,882

  (b)

7.9 %

221,559  (b)7.4 %
Atlanta Capital Management Co LLC 1075 Peachtree Street, Atlanta, GA 30309173,278  (c)5.8 %
River Road Asset Management, LLC 462 S. 4th St., Ste 2000, Louisville, KY 40202169,047

  (d)

5.6 %
Dimensional Fund Advisors LP 600 Bee Cave Road, Austin, TX 78746149,502

  (e)

5.0 %

(a)Information as of December 31, 2021, based on Schedule 13G/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 10, 2022, by and on behalf of The Vanguard Group.
(b)Information as of December 31, 2021, based on Schedule 13G/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 4, 2022, by and on behalf of Wellington Management Group, LLP.
(c)Information as of December 31, 2021, based on Schedule 13F filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 14, 2022, by and on behalf of Atlanta Capital Management Co LLC.
(d)Information as of December 31, 2021, based on Schedule 13G/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 9, 2022, by and on behalf of River Road Asset Management, LLC.
(e)Information as of December 31, 2021, based on Schedule 13F filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 9, 2022, by and on behalf of Dimensional Fund Advisors LP.

 

(a)Information as of February 28, 2020, based on Schedule 13G/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 6, 2020, by and on behalf of The Vanguard Group.

(b)Information as of December 31, 2019, based on Schedule 13G/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 27, 2020, by and on behalf of Wellington Management Group, LLP.

Security Ownership of Management

 

The following table sets forth, as of April 1, 2020,2022, beneficial ownership of common shares by each director, the Named Executive Officers (as defined on page 26)28) and all other executive officers as a group:

 

Amount of Ownership

Amount of Ownership

Name of Beneficial Owner

Beneficially

(a)

 

 

Economically

(b)

Beneficially (a) Economically (b)

Frank R. Bazos

3,600

 

 

 

7,200

 

1,031 2,731 

Reid T. Campbell

16,765

 

 

 

22,565

 

16,818 20,418 

Peter M. Carlson

313

 

 

 

313

 

763 763 

Mary C. Choksi

688

 

 

 

688

 

1,138 1,138 

Morgan W. Davis

9,689

 

 

 

9,689

 

8,569 8,569 
Margaret Dillon225 225 

Philip A. Gelston

563

 

 

 

563

 

1,013 1,013 

Edith E. Holiday

2,602

 

 

 

2,602

 

J. Brian Palmer

3,319

 

 

 

4,769

 

Michaela Hildreth3,425 5,175 

G. Manning Rountree

19,087

 

 

 

27,787

 

22,125 30,225 

Robert L. Seelig

16,950

 

 

 

20,650

 

19,162 22,312 

Lowndes A. Smith

1,102

 

 

 

1,102

 

Susanne F. Shank151 151 

David A. Tanner

938

 

 

 

938

 

1,388 1,388 

All directors, Named Executive Officers and all other executive officers as a group (12 persons)

 75,616

 

 

 

98,866

 

(a) The common shares shown as beneficially owned by all directors, Named Executive Officers and all other executive officers as a group represent 2.4% of the total common shares outstanding at April 1, 2020. No director or executive officer beneficially owned 1% or more of the total common shares outstanding at that date. Beneficial ownership has been determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 of the Exchange Act.

(b) Common shares shown as economically owned include common shares beneficially owned and target unearned performance share awards, less any common shares in which the owner disclaims a pecuniary interest.

All directors, Named Executive Officers and all other executive officers as a group (13 persons) 77,058 96,608 

 

(a)The common shares shown as beneficially owned by all directors, Named Executive Officers and all other executive officers as a group represent 2.6% of the total common shares outstanding at April 1, 2022. No director or executive officer beneficially owned 1% or more of the total common shares outstanding at that date. Beneficial ownership has been determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 of the Exchange Act.
(b)Common shares shown as economically owned include common shares beneficially owned and target unearned performance share awards, less any common shares in which the owner disclaims a pecuniary interest.

21



Table of ContentsEXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

FROM OUR COMPENSATION/NOMINATING & GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE

 

Dear Fellow Shareholders:

 

One of our most important mandatesresponsibilities as the independent Compensation/Nominating & Governance Committee (the “CNG Committee”) is to structure our executive compensation programs and governance practices to create close alignment with our shareholders’ interests, while continuing to attract and retain talented executives to execute on our Company’s strategy and create long-term value.

 

To that end, we regularly seek feedback from our shareholders on our compensation practices and, as appropriate, make refinements that we believe enhance our programs. FollowingWe believe our 2019responsiveness to that input is reflected in our 2021 Say-on-Pay vote, which received nearly 94% support,98% support. This year, we reached out to shareholders owning approximately 72% of White Mountains’ outstanding shares and met with all shareholders who requested meetings,accepted a meeting, who represented 26%19% of our shares outstanding. Ms. Edith Holiday,Mr. Philip Gelston, the CNG Committee chair, personally led discussions in meetings with shareholders representing 13%several of our shares outstanding, which were all meetings in which her participation was requested.these meetings. The feedback received during these meetings was extremely valuable as we evaluatefor our evaluation of our compensation programs for potential improvements in structure or disclosure.

 

20192021 Compensation Program Highlights:

ØBase salaries continue to be capped at $500,000 for all Named Executive Officers
ØAnnual percent-of-salary target bonus opportunities were held flat for all Named Executive Officers
ØApproximately 93% of total target 2021 CEO compensation was linked to Company or share performance and therefore meaningfully “at-risk”
ØFormulaic annual bonus performance metric resulted in no payout to executive officers, further demonstrating the rigor of the compensation program design and its link to performance

 

ØBase salaries were held flat for all Named Executive Officers

ØAnnual percent-of-salary target bonus opportunities were held flat for all Named Executive Officers

ØOver 92%History of total target 2019 CEO compensation was linked to Company or share performance and therefore meaningfully “at-risk”

Changes in ResponseResponsiveness to Shareholder Feedback on Compensation and Governance:

 

ØIntroduced a formulaic annual incentive program for our executive officers, with pre-established, rigorous, and quantifiable performance targets that are relevant for our firm and industry – see page 32

ØEnhanced our ESG practices by (i) amending the Company’s investment policy to address ESG, (ii) adopting a climate change statement, (iii) formalizing the Board’s oversight of ESG matters, (iv) further integrating climate-related risks into our risk management practices and (v) launching an ESG page on our website
ØFulfilled our commitment to increase gender and racial or ethnic diversity on our Board of Directors
ØAdopted a formulaic annual incentive program for our executive officers, with pre-established, rigorous and quantifiable performance targets that are relevant for our firm and industry
ØAdopted robust share ownership guidelines for our executive officers and non-employee directors
ØEnhanced proxy disclosure to include (i) a detailed, individual Board skills matrix that highlights our Board’s key skills and qualifications that are directly relevant to our business, strategy and operations and (ii) greater disclosure about diversity among Board members

 

ØEstablished share ownership guidelines for our executive officers, set at 10x base salary for our CEO and Executive Vice Presidents, and at 3x base salary for other executive officers – see page 35

White Mountains remains in a transitional period marked by thoughtful and patient redeployment of undeployed capital generated from sales of businesses in recent years, and theThe CNG Committee remainsis committed to ensuring that our executive compensation programs and governance practices continue to motivate long-term value creation. We believe the actions highlighted above arewe have been responsive to our shareholders’ input, and we welcome your continued feedback.

 

Sincerely,

 

The White Mountains Insurance Group Compensation/Nominating & Governance Committee

 

Edith E. Holiday, Chair

Morgan W. Davis

Philip A. Gelston, Chair    |    Morgan W. Davis    |    Margaret Dillon    |    Suzanne F. Shank

 

April 7, 20206, 2022

 

22



Table of Contents

 

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

 

Executive Summary

 

Business Overview and 20192021 Performance Highlights

White Mountains is engaged in the business of making opportunistic and value-oriented acquisitions of businesses and assets in the insurance, financial services and related sectors, operating those businesses and assets through its subsidiaries and, if and when attractive exit valuations become available, divesting to realize gains on their sale. Our principal focus is to grow adjusted book value per share (“ABVPS”) because we believe, based on the trading history of our stock, that over the long term our share price growth will parallel our growth in ABVPS (see chart and discussion on page 30)32). Since our IPO, including dividends, White Mountains has delivered 13% annualized growth in ABVPS and 12%11% annualized growth in market value per share. Having sold off a number of significant businesses from 2015-2017, which generated $1.4 billion in transaction gains and left us with $3.1 billion of pro forma undeployed capital, we remain in a transitional period as we continue to work to thoughtfully redeploy and distribute the proceeds of those transactions.

 

2019 was a strongWe finished 2021 with book value per share of $1,176 and adjusted book value per share of $1,190, decreases of 7% and 6% from the prior year, for our Company driven by good operating resultsrespectively. Excluding the mark-to-market decline in our main businesses and strong absolute investment returns, which led to a strong one-year total shareholder return of 30.2%.  Excludingin MediaAlpha, adjusted book value per share increased 4% for the gainyear, reflecting positive results from the MediaAlpha transaction in February 2019, we grew ABVPS by 8.1% and our total investment portfolio returned 15.5%.operating businesses.

 

In 2019,2021, Ark produced good underwriting results in a heavy catastrophe year, while growing full year premiums 77%. At BAM, investor demand for bond insurance remained strong, and BAM insured a record $15.6 billion of par in the primary market. NSM finished 2021 with new highs for pro forma controlled premiums and pro forma adjusted EBITDA. Kudu produced strong growth in adjusted EBITDA and completed five acquisitions. We also smoothly effected leadership succession in our senior management team and appointed and on-boarded two independent directors, Mmes. Shank and Dillon, who reinforce and expand the Board’s skill set. Finally, we redeployed $435 million into businesses, following $332 million in capital deployments in 2018,successfully navigated year two of the COVID-19 pandemic with balance and we ended the year with undeployed capital of $1.0 billion.  We expectsensitivity, supporting our returns to continue to normalize and revenues to grow as we finish redeploying and distributing this capital.employees while resuming in-office work.

 

2019 Performance Highlights

$435 million

of capital deployments

8.1% growth in ABVPS

(excl. the MediaAlpha transaction)

Commitment to Ongoing Shareholder Engagement

As part of our ongoing commitment to better understand the views of our shareholders with respect to our business, governance, and compensation practices, we have continued our investor outreach efforts in 2019.2021. Over the past several years, feedback received from these discussions has helped guide refinements to our executive compensation programs and governance practices, as well as enhancements to our public disclosure.disclosures. A summary of these efforts in 2019,2021, feedback received and our history of responsiveness is included below:

 

23 



TableHistory of ContentsDemonstrated Responsiveness

 

In response to feedback from our shareholders, we have made the following changes and enhancements to our compensation and governance programs since 2019:

 

ØEnhanced ESG practices and disclosures, including

The Right

amending the Company’s investment policy to address ESG,
adopting a climate change statement,
formalizing the Board’s oversight of ESG matters,
further integrating climate-related risks into our risk management practices, and
establishing an ESG landing page on our website

ØIntroduced a formulaic annual incentive program for our executive officers, with pre-established, rigorous and quantifiable performance targets that are relevant for our firm and industry

ØEstablished share ownership guidelines for our executive officers and non-employee directors

ØIncluded a detailed, individual Board skills matrix in our proxy statement that highlights our Board’s key skills and qualifications that are directly relevant to our business, strategy and operations, and enhanced disclosures concerning the diversity of our Board

Compensation Peer Group

As described in more detail below, the CNG Committee refers to a peer group as part of its evaluation of the Company’s compensation practices. Importantly, we do not use this peer group to benchmark compensation. Rather, we evaluate the executive compensation programs of these peers in terms of structure and variability of payouts in good and poor performance scenarios. We seek to structure our compensation program to be more variable than most other insurance and reinsurance peers. The CNG Committee believes that our compensation structures closely align the financial interests of management with those of our shareholders and encourage appropriate, but not excessive, risk taking.

 

We have made meaningful progress in redeploying and distributing the proceeds from our sale transactions in recent years.  However, as we continue to have $1 billion of undeployed capital, our returns are not comparable to peers who are fully deployed, and pay level benchmarking comparisons to any peer group, including our own, are not meaningful at this time. The CNG Committee regularly evaluates the continuing appropriateness of our peer group and will revisithas accordingly made several refinements to our peer group, as we continue to redeploy capital.effective for fiscal 2021. See page 2930 for further details on our 20192021 peer group.

 

26

Compensation Program Aligned with Company Performance

 

In assessing the design of our executive compensation program, we value input from our shareholders and incorporate their feedback into our assessment. The current design of our compensation program consists of three primary elements: base salary, annual incentive bonus and long-term incentive compensation. Each element isstructured with the primary goal of maximizing shareholder value over long periods of time. Highlights of our 20192021 compensation program are as follows:

 

24


Table of ContentsElements and Structure

 

Elements and Structure 

 

 

25

1 The average of growth in adjusted book value per share (ABVPS) and growth in intrinsic value per share, which is the ABVPS including franchise value step-ups to reflect the fair value of certain subsidiaries carried at book value. See Annex A for a reconciliation of growth in ABVPS and growth in intrinsic value per share.



Table of Contents

 

We believe that the goal of maximizing shareholder value over long periods of time is best pursued by utilizing a pay-for-performance program that closely aligns the financial interest of management with those of our shareholders while rewarding appropriate risk taking. We accomplish this by emphasizing variable long-term compensation, the value of which is tied to performance over a number of years rather than fixed entitlements. To illustrate, 86%88% of our CEO’s 20192021 target total direct compensation was linked to long-term incentives, while 8%approximately 7% was made up of base salary, and 6%5% linked to annual cash bonus opportunity at target.

 

Chief Executive Officer:

 

Other NEOs:

Other NEOs:

 

Named Executive Officers

 

In this CD&A, we review the philosophy of White Mountains’s executive compensation program, the compensation process, the program’s elements, and the 20192021 and 20202022 compensation decisions for our named executive officers:Named Executive Officers:

 

2012021 Named Executive Officers

9 G. Manning RountreeChief Executive Officer
NReid T. Campbell*Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
aRobert L. SeeligExecutive Vice President & General Counsel
mMichaela HildrethManaging Director & Chief Accounting Officer
eFrank R. Bazos**d Executive Officers

Former Executive Vice President & Head of Mergers & Acquisitions

G. Manning Rountree* On March 1, 2022, Mr. Campbell became President of White Mountains and will serve in that role until his retirement in February 2024. Mr. Liam P. Caffrey became Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of White Mountains on that date.

Chief Executive Officer

Reid T. Campbell

Executive Vice President &Chief Financi** Mr. Bazos served as al Officer

Frank R. Bazos

Executive Vice President &Head of Mergers &Acquisitions of WM Capital

Robert L. Seelig

Executive Vice President &General Counsel

J. Brian Palmer

Managing Director &Chief Accounting Officer named executive officer during 2021. Effective March 1, 2021, Mr. Bazos resigned from his role and became an advisor to management. 

 

Unless otherwise noted, the term named executive officersNamed Executive Officers (or “NEOs”) refers to the group of the five individuals listed in the above table,table; the term “CEO” refers to Mr. Rountree,Rountree; and the term “CFO” refers to Mr. Campbell and the term “CNG Committee” refers to the Compensation/Nominating & Governance Committee of the Board of Directors of White Mountains.through February 28, 2022.

28

 

Business Overview, Significant Transactions, in 2015-2017 and Performance Highlights

 

White Mountains is engaged in the business of making opportunistic and value-oriented acquisitions of businesses and assets in the insurance, financial services and related sectors, operating these businesses and assets through its subsidiaries and, if and when attractive exit valuations become available, divesting to realize gains on the sale of these businesses and assets.

 

From 2015-2017, White Mountains soldfinished 2021 with book value per share of $1,176 and adjusted book value per share of $1,190, decreases of 7% and 6% from the prior year, respectively. During the year, MediaAlpha’s share price declined from $39.07 to $15.44, giving back a numberportion of its businesses—Sirius, Symetra, Tranzactthe gains created in 2020. This decline was a key driver of White Mountains financial results in 2021. Excluding this decline, adjusted book value per share increased 4% for the year, reflecting positive results from our operating businesses.

In 2021, Ark produced good underwriting results in a heavy catastrophe year, while growing full year premiums 77%. At BAM, investor demand for bond insurance remained strong, and OneBeacon—as buyers made compelling offers that resulted in roughly $1.4BAM insured a record $15.6 billion of transaction gainspar in the primary market. NSM finished 2021 with new highs for pro forma controlled premiums and drovepro forma adjusted EBITDA. Kudu produced strong growth in ABVPS.  As a resultadjusted EBITDA and completed five acquisitions. We also smoothly effected leadership succession in our senior management team and appointed and on-boarded two independent directors, Mmes. Shank and Dillon. Finally, we successfully navigated year two of these sales, the Company is in a transitional period as management works to intelligently redeployCOVID-19 pandemic with balance and distribute the transaction proceeds.  As of May 2017, on a pro forma basis for theOneBeacon sale, the Company had undeployed capital of $3.1 billion on a capital base of $4.2 billion.  In addition, after the sales, the Company generated much lower revenues than before the sales, and the high level of undeployed capital implied a low single digit go-forward rate of growth in ABVPS. As undeployed capital continues to be deployed or distributed, we expect returns to normalize and revenues to grow.

26


Table of Contents

In 2019, we continued to make good progress and deployed $435 million.  Three significant deals emerged fromsensitivity, supporting our platform companies: (i) Embrace, a pet insurance MGA acquired by NSM, (ii) the acquisition of NSM’s collector car renewal rights and (iii) our buyout of Oaktree’s 50% interest in Kudu.  As of December 31, 2019, undeployed capital was down to $1.0 billion. In 2019, excluding the gain from the early 2019 MediaAlpha transaction, ABVPS and CVPS grew by 8.1% and 9.1%, respectively.  These results outperformed their respective targets for the year, which were set rigorously by the CNG Committee above the prior period targets.  In addition, for the 2017-2019 performance cycle, the average annual growth in ABVPS and CVPS was 8.9% and 7.9%, respectively.employees while resuming in-office work.

 

The Company remains focused on creating shareholder value, while targeting redeployment in its areas of expertise: primarily insurance, broader financial services and adjacent sectors.businesses we own today position us well for the future. The Company remains value-oriented, opportunistic, and highly flexible.focused on running our businesses efficiently and creating shareholder value.

 

Shareholder Engagement and 2019 Compensation Program ChangesHistory of Demonstrated Responsiveness

 

Engaging with our owners is central to our commitment to good governance and critical to maintaining our strong corporate governance practices. Building on our 2018 engagement efforts, our 2019Our 2021 shareholder outreach was led by the Board and senior management, often including our CNG Committee chair, Ms. Edith Holiday,Mr. Philip Gelston, leading the discussion and providing a direct line of communication between the Board and our shareholders. FollowingIn our 20192021 Say-on-Pay vote, whichwe received nearly 94% support,98% support. This year, we reached out to shareholders representing approximately 72% of our outstanding shares and met with all shareholders who requestedaccepted meetings, who represented 26%19% of our shares outstanding. Ms. HolidayMr. Gelston personally led discussions in meetings with shareholders representing approximately 13% of our shares outstanding, which were all meetings in which her participation was requested.outstanding. Shareholder feedback received from these meetings was shared with the entire Board and helpedhelp to inform the CNG Committee’s thinking as it evaluated our compensation programs to continue to motivate and reward our executive officers for strong performance in executing our strategic transformation, while also taking into account shareholders’ views on the structure of our compensation programs.responsiveness actions.

 

The main topics in our engagement meetings were our current business strategy, corporate governance (including Board diversity), executive compensation program, and boardpractices, Board oversight of risk management.management, and ESG practices and disclosure. More specifically, we discussed the changes we made to our compensation program in 2019, our continued board refreshmentbusiness developments with the appointmentArk, NSM, Kudu, MediaAlpha, and BAM businesses, our addition of two members to the Company’s Board in 2019 of2021 (Mmes. Shank and Dillon), our newest independent director, insurance industry veteran Peter Carlson,recently enhanced ESG practices and disclosures, and our environmental and sustainability practices.executive compensation program. Our shareholders were overwhelmingly supportive of our successful capital redeployment efforts, Board refreshment, approach to ESG disclosure and oversight, and executive compensation programs, including the performance metrics used in our 2019 annual bonus program and 2019-2021 long-term incentives, and our patient capital redeployment efforts.programs. Shareholder feedback is regularly communicated to our full Board, and the input we received previously directly informedinfluenced the enhancements implementedwe made to our proxy disclosure, ESG disclosure, and executive compensation program in 2019 (summarized below), as well as the expanded disclosure in this year’s proxy statement (e.g., Board’s Role in ESG Oversight and Director Skills and Qualifications with an individual skills matrix).

2019 executive compensation program changes in response to shareholder feedback were:

ØIntroduced a formulaic annual incentive program for our executive officers, with pre-established, rigorous, and quantifiable performance targets that are relevant for our firm and industry – see page 32 for additional detail

ØEstablished share ownership guidelines for our executive officers, set at 10x base salary for our CEO and Executive Vice Presidents, and at 3x base salary for other executive officers – see page 35 for additional detailprogram.

 

The Company’s management and Board is committed to continuing its extensive shareholder outreach program.

 


Compensation PhilosophyPhilosophy

 

Our executive compensation policies are designed with the primary goal of maximizing shareholder value over long periods of time. We believe that this goal is best pursued by utilizing a pay-for-performance program that closely aligns the financial interests of management with those of our shareholders while rewarding appropriate risk taking. We accomplish this by emphasizing variable long-term compensation, the value of which is tied to performance over a number of years rather than fixed entitlements (such as base salary, pensions, and employee benefits). To that end, the CNG Committee has established

27


Table of Contents

base salaries and target annual bonuses for our executives that tend to be lower than those paid by comparable property and casualty insurers and reinsurers, while granting the bulk of an executive’sexecutive's target compensation as long-term incentive compensation. To illustrate, 86%88% of our CEO’s 20192021 target total direct compensation was linked to long-term incentives, while 8%approximately 7% was made up of base salary and 6%5% was target annual cash bonus opportunity.

 

The following principles guide and inform the CNG Committee’s efforts to deliver a highly effective executive compensation program that drives shareholder value and fosters the attraction and motivation of key talent:

 

Manage for the Long-Term

 

The Board manages for the long-term and makes pay decisions with the primary goal of maximizing shareholder value over long periods of time

Alignment with Shareholders

Compensation is directly linked to performance and is aligned with shareholders by having a majority of NEO pay at risk in both short- and long-term incentives

Extensive Shareholder Engagement

We engage directly with our shareholders, and our Board carefully reviews shareholder feedback as it considers refinements to our compensation practices

Share Ownership Guidelines

Executives are required to meet and maintain significant share ownership requirements: 10x base salary for our CEO and EVPs, and 3x base salary for other executive officers.

 

Compensation Setting Process

The CNG Committee is responsible for approving our compensation programs for executive officers, and it specifically approves all compensation for our executive officers and for any employee with target annual compensation in excess of $1.5 million. Our CEO annually presents to the CNG Committee his evaluation of our executives, their individual performance, achievements, and the contributions they made to the Company’sCompany's accomplishments over the past year, as well as over the most recent long-term incentive plan cycle. In connection with this evaluation, the CEO recommends to the CNG Committee appropriate compensation amounts for these executives. The CNG Committee evaluates these recommendations and also assesses the performance, responsibilities and contributions of the CEO, considers CEO succession plans, and sets the compensation of the CEO.

 

With the exception of significant promotions and new hires, compensation matters are usually addressed at the first meeting of the CNG Committee each year (typically late February), following the availability of financial results for the prior year and the current year’s financial plan. This allows us to determine the results of prior period grantsand to set targets for the current year and newest long-term performance cycle. Performance cycles for long-term compensation typically run for three years beginning on January 1st of the year of grant.

 

Compensation Peer Group

 

When making new long-term incentive grants, the CNG Committee assesses the impact of different performance scenarios on potential realizable compensation. Further, in order to test our beliefs about the structure and variability of the awards we make, the CNG Committee annually reviews and considers a systematic analysis of the public compensation disclosures made by other property and casualty insurers and reinsurers that the CNG Committee considers to be peers.

 

Importantly, our compensation peer group is not used for benchmarking purposes, but rather to analyze whether our compensation programs are appropriately structured and to ensure they are more variable than most other insurance and reinsurance peers.  We remain in a thoughtful transitional period of redeploying substantial proceeds from past value-generating transactions, and as such our returns with $1.0 billion of capital undeployed as of year-end will not be comparable to peers who are fully deployed.  Therefore, pay level benchmarking comparisons to any peer group, including our own, is not meaningful at this time.

28


Table of Contents

The companies included in the analysis presented to the CNG Committee prior to it making compensation decisions in 2019 were:

 

2019 Peer Group

·

Alleghany Corporation

·

CNA Financial

·

Arch Capital Group

·

Everest Re Group

·

Argo Group

·

Markel Corp

·

Aspen Insurance Holdings

·

RenaissanceRe Holdings

·

Axis Capital

·

Selective Insurance Group

·

Cincinnati Financial

·

W.R. Berkley


 

The Company uses this group of companies as it reflects traditional competitors of White Mountains. The CNG Committee regularly evaluates the continuing appropriateness of this group.  Even though sales transactions overgroup and did so again during 2021. As a result of this review, two of the past five years temporarily lowered our go-forward revenueslargest companies from the most recent peer group were removed (Cincinnati Financial and near-term growthCNA Financial), while six additional size-appropriate companies who could generally be considered as competitors were added to the peer group (Assured Guaranty, Enstar, Hanover, Kinsale, RLI, and SiriusPoint).

The companies included in ABVPS expectations, our strategy remains intact as we lookthe analysis presented to redeploy our capital.  Therefore, the CNG Committee believes this group currently remains appropriate for the Company’s competitive analysis, as a temporary reductionprior to it making compensation decisions in revenues following significantly value-generating asset sales is not an appropriate catalyst for what would be an interim peer group change at this time.2021 were:

2021 Peer Group
·Alleghany·Hanover
·Arch Capital·Kinsale
·Argo·Markel
·Aspen·RenaissanceRe
·Assured Guaranty·RLI
·Axis Capital·Selective
·Enstar·SiriusPoint
·Everest Re·W.R. Berkley

 

The CNG Committee concluded that the peer analysis supported its view that the Company’s compensation programs are more variable than most other insurance and reinsurance peers, have fewer fixed elements of compensation and perquisites, and do not lead to significant rewards for poor performance. The CNG Committee believes that the compensation structures that have been developed for the Company closely align the financial interests of management with those of our shareholders and encourage appropriate, but not excessive, risk taking.

 

Compensation Best Practices

 

We maintain a number of compensation governance best practices which support our overarching compensation philosophy and are fully aligned with our compensation principles, as discussed in the following section. Our compensation practices also align with input we have received from shareholders.

 

Key Compensation Highlights

What We Do

What We Do Not Do

ü   Commitment to pay for performance as evidenced by having over 92%approximately 93% of total target 20192021 CEO compensation linked to company, stock or individual performance and, therefore, meaningfully “at-risk”

ü   Half of annual LTI delivered in performance-based equity, with a three-year measurement period

üFormulaic annual incentive program, based on pre-determined goals

üClawback policy for annual and long-term incentive plans

üDouble-trigger change-in-control provisions

üAnnual Say-On-Pay vote

üShare ownership guidelines for executive officers

 

OûNo hedging of Company securities

OûNo executive pensions

OûNo single-trigger vesting of equity-based awards upon change-in-control

OûNo excise tax gross-ups upon change-in-control

OûNo dividends on unvested performance shares

OûNo long-term employment agreements with executive officers

OûNo excessive perquisites or benefits

 

29


31

Table of Contents

Superior Track Record and the Alignment of Growth in ABVPS and Market Value Per Share

From our IPO in 1985 through year-end 2019,2021, we have delivered 13% annualized growth in ABVPS and 12%11% annualized growth in market value per share to our shareholders. Importantly, as seen in the chart below, ABVPS and market value per share have generally moved in tandem over the last thirty-five years, despite short-term fluctuations. This is a core reasoning behindfactor supporting the CNG Committee’s selection of incentive plan performance metrics that relate to growth in book value per share.

30


Table of Contents

32

Compensation for 20192021

The principal elements of compensation for our executives in 20192021 - base salary, annual incentive bonuses and long-term incentive compensation - are discussed below.

 

20192021 Target Annual Direct Compensation Mix

 

 

 

1.Base Salary

1.Base Salary

 

As discussed above under “Compensation Philosophy”, the Company’s compensation program emphasizes variable long-term incentive compensation, rather than fixed entitlements. Accordingly, we pay our executive officers salaries that we believe to be below market. In 2008, we limited base salaries to a maximum of $500,000. Each of our Named Executive Officers currently receives a salary of $500,000, other than Mr. Palmer who receives a salary of $400,000.

The base salaries in effect for each of our NEOs were not increasedfor 2021 and 2022 are listed in 2019, and they are also kept flat for 2020:the table below:

 

`

Base Salaries in Effect During

Base Salaries in Effect During

Executive

2018

2019

2020

20212022

G. Manning Rountree

$500,000

$500,000

$500,000

Reid T. Campbell

$500,000

$500,000

$500,000

Frank R. Bazos

--

 $500,0001

$500,000

Robert L. Seelig

$500,000

$500,000

$500,000

J. Brian Palmer

$400,000

$400,000

1 Mr. Bazos commenced employment on May 1, 2019, therefore he earned a pro-rated salary of $323,077 for 2019.

Michaela Hildreth$425,000$500,000
Frank R. Bazos*$250,000

 

31___________________


Table of Contents* Effective March 1, 2021, Mr. Bazos resigned from his role and became an advisor to management at a $250,000 annual salary.

  

2.Annual Incentive Bonuses

2.Annual Incentive Bonuses

 

We provide annual bonus opportunities to our executive officers, which make up a small percentage of each NEO’s target total annual compensation – 6%approximately 5% for our CEO, and 11% on average for the other NEOs in 20192021 – as the bulk of our executive officers’ compensation opportunity is tied to long-term incentives. Each Named Executive OfficerNEO participates in the annual bonus pool applicable to the parent holding companies. For 2019,2021, the target bonus pool was $5.6$6.9 million for 4259 employees.

Following the 2018 annual general meeting, the Company’s management team, along with CNG Committee chair Edith Holiday, who participated in a significant portion of the meetings, engaged with shareholders representing approximately 50% of our outstanding shares.  Based on those discussions and as a direct response to feedback, the CNG Committee has introduced a formulaic annual incentive program in effect for 2019 for our executive officers, with pre-established, rigorous, quantifiable performance targets relevant for our firm and industry.


 

Under our quantitativeformulaic annual bonus program, the level of payout is determined by reference to the Company’s growth in CVPS, which is defined by the CNG Committee as the average of growth in ABVPS and growth in “intrinsic business value per share,”share”, which is the ABVPS including franchise value step-ups to reflect the fair value of certain subsidiaries carried at book value. In choosing this metric for the annual bonus program, the CNG Committee recognized that this is the same metric as used in a portion of the Company’s long-term incentives (albeit for a different time period). The CNG Committee considered a number of other metrics but concluded that no other metric is as pertinent to our business as CVPS. CVPS is the metric that the Board and the management team focus on because it is linked to growth in book value per share metrics, which we believe is what ultimately drives growth in our share price for our shareholders.  As previously disclosed in our 2019 proxy statement, 2019price. The 2021 annual bonuses were eligible to be earned rangingbonus pool could range from 0% to 200% of target, according tobased on the harvest scale of 2%-7%-12%.3%-8%-13% growth in CVPS.

 

For our executive officers, the CNG Committee maintains the discretion to decrease the individual annual bonus payouts after the quantitative formula has been applied, however it does not have discretion to increase payouts. Our executive officers at most,cannot receive more than the quantitativeformulaic result.

 

For 2019,2021, the Named Executive OfficersNEOs (other than Mr. Bazos) had target annual bonuses of 75% of salary, which was unchanged from the prior year and is continued into 2020.2022. Mr. Bazos was not eligible for an annual bonus in 2021 due to his resignation effective March 1, 2021. Based on the Company’s performance of 9.1% growtha 1.2% decline in CVPS in 2019,2021, the CNG Committee awarded the NEOs with bonuses of 141%0% of target.  The lone exception was Mr. Bazos, who joined the Company in May 2019, whose annual bonus for 2019 was set at target of $375,000 pursuant to his offer letter.

 

2019 Annual Bonus Decisions

2021 Annual Bonus Decisions

Executive

Target Bonus

Earned Bonus

% of Target

Target BonusEarned Bonus% of Target

G. Manning Rountree

$375,000

$528,750

141%

$375,000$00%

Reid T. Campbell

$375,000

$528,750

141%

$375,000$00%

Frank R. Bazos

$375,000

$375,000

100%

Robert L. Seelig

$375,000

$528,750

141%

$375,000$00%

J. Brian Palmer

$300,000

$423,000

141%

Michaela Hildreth$318,750$00%

 

 

3.Long-Term Incentive Compensation

 

Long-term equity awards generally consist of an equal mix of performance shares and restricted shares, rewarding long-term value creation and aligning executives’ interests with shareholders.shareholders’ interests. Restricted shares are subject to a three-year cliff-vesting provision, instead of annual vesting, in order to promote retention that balances incentives to redeploy capital aggressively and to remain patient for good opportunities. The number of WTM common shares earned from a grant of performance shares can range from 0%-200% of target, based on after-tax annual growth in CVPS over the three-year performance cycle.

 

32


Table of Contents

The CNG Committee selected performance metrics that relate to growth in book value per share because it continues to believe these metrics ultimately drive growth in our share price for our shareholders.price. The market value of our shares is not included as a direct measure of performance, but it determines the ultimate value of earned performance and restricted share awards.

 

From year-to-year when we make new long-term incentive grants, we typically adjust the target number of shares granted to individual employees to reflect the change in CVPS during the prior year, rather than focusing on changes in market values. This is consistent with our view that the change in book value per share and related metrics provides a better view of the change in value of the Company than metrics reflecting short-term market price fluctuations. In addition, we generally limit total annual share grants to employees to equal to or less than 1% of the Company’s outstanding shares. For each of the 2017-2019,past five grant cycles (from 2018-2020 2019-2021, and 2020-2022 cycles,to 2022-2024), we adhered to this guideline.


New2021 Long-Term Incentive Grants in 2019:: For the CEO and each of our other NEOs (other than Mr. Bazos), the annual 20192021 long-term incentive awards were allocated 50% as performance shares and 50% as restricted shares, consistent with prior years. With respect to the total grants made to employees across the Company, the CNG Committee granted 26,950 target shares for the 2021-2023 performance cycle, which represented a 4% decrease, year over year, in the number of shares granted. These grants totaled approximately 0.9% of the then outstanding shares, within the CNG Committee’s 1% guideline. The restricted shares are subject to a three-year cliff vesting provision based on continuous service, in order to promote retention of key executive talent. The performance shares will vest in a range of 0% - 200% of target, following a three-year performance period.

 

For the 2019-20212021-2023 performance period, the CNG Committee established a target of 7%8% annual growth in CVPS as the performance target that would result in the payout of 100% of the target performance shares.shares, which is an increase over the 7% annual growth target utilized for the 2020-2022 performance period. There would be no payout for annual growth of 2%3% or less, and annual growth of 12%13% or more would be required for a payout of 200%. Importantly, the target and maximum goals for the 2019-2021 performance cycle (2%-7%-12%) were set higher than the previous 2018-2020 cycle (2%-6%-10%), which in turn were set higher than the previous 2017-2019 cycle (1%-5%-9%).  In setting this performance scale, a primary goal of the CNG CommitteeCommittee’s goal was to set a performance target that would incentivize managementwas reasonable, but with an appropriate degree of stretch. Importantly, the 8% target was roughly equal to redeploythe Company’s 10YT + 700 basis points guidepost, allowing us to fulfill our commitment to shareholders since our dispositions in 2015-2017. Over the past several years, we have consistently communicated our intention to deploy the large amount of capital thoughtfully.  The CNG Committee took account offrom these dispositions patiently and sensibly, and eventually get our target back to the level of deployed and undeployed capital (and the expected run rate returns thereon) and made assumptions regarding the timing and magnitude of future deployment and distributions of undeployed capital.10YT + 700 basis points level. In addition, the CNG Committee considered that the one-year performance scale for the 20192021 annual bonus program was the same as the three-year average performance scale being set for the 2019-20212021-2023 performance shares. The Committee determined that this scale was appropriate due to the factors discussed above and their applicability over a longer time frame (which equates to aggregate growth of 6%-23%-40%9%-26%-44% over a three-year period).

 

A detailed breakdown of the fiscal 20192021 grants areis included in the table below:

 

2019 Long-Term Incentive Grants

2021 Long-Term Incentive Grants

 

 

 

 

 

 

      

Grant Date

Restricted Shares

Performance Shares

Total 2019 LTI
Grant Value

Grant DateRestricted SharesPerformance SharesTotal 2021 LTI Grant Value

Executive

# Shares

Grant Value

# Shares

Grant Value

# SharesGrant Value# SharesGrant Value

G. Manning Rountree

2/27/2019

3,000

$2,804,100

3,000

$2,804,100

$5,608,200

2/25/20212,700 $      3,239,2172,700 $      3,239,217 $          6,478,434

Reid T. Campbell

2/27/2019

2,000

$1,869,400

2,000

$1,869,400

$3,738,800

2/25/20211,800 $      2,159,4781,800 $      2,159,478 $          4,318,956

Frank R. Bazos

5/1/2019

1,900

$1,749,805

1,900

$1,749,805

$3,499,610

Robert L. Seelig

2/27/2019

1,000

$934,700

1,000

$934,700

$1,869,400

2/25/20211,000 $      1,199,7101,000 $      1,199,710 $          2,399,420

J. Brian Palmer

2/27/2019

500

$467,350

500

$467,350

$934,700

Michaela Hildreth2/25/2021600 $         719,826600 $         719,826 $          1,439,652

 

In determining the amount of new long-term incentive compensation grants for 20192021 for our named executive officers,NEOs, the CNG Committee assessed each executive’s scope of authority and ability to impact the success of the Company. Based on the CNG Committee’s general experience and the recommendation of the CEO, for NEOs other than himself, the CNG Committee established a grant level that it believed was appropriate to reflect each such executive’s expected contribution to the Company over the next performance cycle.

 

Mr. Bazos did not receive a long-term incentive grant in 2021 due to his resignation effective March 1, 2021.

Payout of 2017-20192019-2021 Performance Cycle: For the 2017-20192019-2021 performance cycle, long-term incentives were granted to the NEOs as follows: 50% as performance shares and 50% as restricted shares. For the performance shares, which matured at the end of 2019, 5%2021, 7% annual growth in CVPS was the performance target for a payout of 100% of the target performance shares. Annual growth of 1%2% or less would have resulted

33


Table of Contents

in no payout and annual growth of 9%12% or more would have resulted in a payout of 200%. At its meeting in February 2020,2022, based on an average annual growth in CVPS of 7.9%10.6%, the Performance Compensation SubcommitteeCNG Committee confirmed that the payout that was earned was 174%172% of target.

 

2017-2019 Performance Share Cycle

Executive

Target Shares

Performance Scale
(min / target / max)

Actual Average
Annual CVPS Growth

Payout %

Shares
Earned

2019-2021 Performance Share Cycle2019-2021 Performance Share Cycle
Target SharesPerformance Scale
(min / target / max)
Actual Annual PerformancePayout %Shares Earned

G. Manning Rountree

3,000

1% - 5% - 9%

7.9%

174%

5,220

3,0002% - 7% - 12%10.6%172%        5,160

Reid T. Campbell

2,250

1% - 5% - 9%

7.9%

174%

3,915

2,0002% - 7% - 12%10.6%172%        3,440

Robert L. Seelig

2,000

1% - 5% - 9%

7.9%

174%

3,480

1,0002% - 7% - 12%10.6%172%        1,720

J. Brian Palmer

560

1% - 5% - 9%

7.9%

174%

974

Michaela Hildreth4002% - 7% - 12%10.6%172%           688
Frank R. Bazos1,9002% - 7% - 12%10.6%172%        3,268

 

20202022 Compensation Actions

Target total cash compensation opportunities remain generally unchanged from 2019.  2021, with base salaries capped at $500,000, combined with 75%-of-salary target bonus opportunities. At its February 20202022 meeting, the CNG Committee increased Ms. Hildreth’s salary to $500,000 and decided to keep the NEOs’ 2020all other NEO 2022 base salaries and percent-of-salary target bonus opportunities at the same levels as in 2019.2021. This reflected the CNG Committee’s long-standing philosophy of linking a vast majority of executives’ compensation to long-term incentives in order to align their interests with those of our shareholders, as opposed to awarding high levels of fixed or variable annual cash compensation.

 

Further, the design of our executive officers’ 20202022 annual bonus plan will be similar to the plan in effect for 2019, 2021, with payouts tied to annual growth in CVPS and a harvest scale of 2%-7%-12% annual CVPS growth set4%-9%-14% for threshold / target / maximum payout levels.  Atlevels, which is an increase over the time of the CNG Committee meeting3%-8%-13% scale that was in February, the 7% target reflected a 540 basis point spread to the yield on the 10-year treasury bond, which was a 90 basis point increase in the spread from a year before.  As a result, and combined with the Company continuing to have $1.0 billion of undeployed capital, the CNG Committee determined to pause the increases in the target that had been madeeffect for the past few years and that 7% was an appropriate target for the 2020 annual bonus plan.  However, the CNG Committee expects that in future years the target will continue to increase.2021.

 

20202022 Long-term Incentive Grants. In February 2020,2022, the CNG Committee made new long-term incentive grants to the Named Executive OfficersNEOs (other than Messrs. Campbell and Bazos) based on the same factors described above with respect to grants made in 20192021 and allocated 50% as performance shares and 50% as restricted shares. With respect to the total grants made to allemployees ofacross the Company, the CNG Committee granted 28,11026,150 target shares for the 2020-20222022-2024 performance cycle, which represents a 10%3% decrease, year over year, in the number of shares granted.  This reflects our longstanding policy of adjusting the baseline pool size in a given year inversely proportionally to the increase or decrease in intrinsic value per share in the prior year.  In total, the WTM performance share and restricted sharegranted. These grants made to all employees of the Company for the 2020-2022 performance cycle totaled approximately 0.9% of the then outstanding shares, within the CNG Committee’s 1% guideline discussed above.

 

With approximately $1.0 billionThe CNG Committee set a performance target of undeployed capital at year-end 2019, deploying capital intelligently remains the key job for9% annual growth in CVPS, which is above the Company’s management team.  Taking accountguidepost of the same factors discussed above with respect toyield at the annual bonus plan, as well asbeginning of the level of deployed and undeployed capital (and current expected run rate returns thereon overperiod on the three-year performance period) and reasonable assumptions regarding the timing and magnitude of future redeployment and distributions of undeployed capital, the10 YT + 700 basis points. The CNG Committee determined that 7%9% annual growth in CVPS is an appropriately challenging target for a payout of 100% of the target performance shares for the 2020-20222022-2024 performance cycle.cycle, which is an increase over the 8% annual growth in CVPS target utilized for the 2021 grants. Annual growth of 2%4% or less would result in no payout, of 0%, and annual growth of 12%14% or more would be required forresult in a payout of 200%. As seen in the table below, the performance target goals associated with our performance shares have increased significantlymeaningfully over the past five grant cycles.

 

Performance Cycle

Target Shares
Granted

% Change from Prior
Year

Performance Target
(min / target / max)

2016 - 2018

45,460

(23%)

0% - 4% - 8%

2017 - 2019

35,275

(22%)

1% - 5% - 9%

2018 - 2020

26,900

(24%)

2% - 6% - 10%

2019 - 2021

31,200

16%

2% - 7% - 12%

2020 - 2022

28,110

(10%)

2% - 7% - 12%

34


Table of Contents

Performance CycleTarget Shares Granted% Change from Prior YearPerformance Target
(min / target / max)
2022 - 202426,150(3%)4% - 9% - 14%
2021 - 202326,950(4%)3% - 8% - 13%
2020 - 202228,110(10%)2% - 7% - 12%
2019 - 202131,20016%2% - 7% - 12%
2018 - 202026,900(24%)2% - 6% - 10%

 

The CNG Committee believes this target and scale properly balance the competing incentives (i)incentivize management to deploy or distribute undeployed capital aggressively and (ii) to remain patient for good opportunities.manage our businesses efficiently, without taking inappropriate risks.


 

Share Ownership Guidelines for Executive Officers.  Officers

The CNG Committee has established share ownership guidelines for our executive officers. According to the guidelines, our CEO and EVPs are required to hold Company shares with a value of 10x salary, while other executive officers are required to hold Company shares with a value of 3x salary. Shares received upon vesting must be held until the executive is in compliance with the guideline. Unvested restricted shares will count toward satisfaction of the guideline, while unvested performance shares will not count. As of December 31, 20192021, all named executive officers, with the exception of Mr. Bazos, areNEOs were in compliance with the guidelines.  As Mr. Bazos has joined the Company during 2019, he will be required to hold shares received upon vesting of any past and future equity awards until he is in compliance with the guidelines.

 

Clawback Policy

 

The Company has adopted a clawback policy applicable to bonuses and long-term incentive awards. If the Company restates any financial statement included in an SEC filing as a result of an employee’s misconduct, the Board may, without prejudice to any other remedies available to the Company, seek reimbursement of any bonus or long-term incentive award received by such person that relates in whole or in part to any period for which such financial statements were restated. If the misconduct involved fraud, then in addition to other actions the Board will mandatorily seek such reimbursement.

Other Elements of Compensation

 

Retirement Benefits

 

We have no active U.S. defined benefit pension plans. Benefit accruals under all our U.S. qualified defined benefit pension plans and all our U.S. supplemental defined benefit pension plans were frozen for all employees in 2002.

 

Our Named Executive Officers who are not employees of Bermuda-domiciled entities may participate in our voluntary non-qualified deferred compensation plans whereby they may defer all or a portion of their compensation.  Investment options in these plans are those available in our 401(k) plans, including White Mountains common shares.  None of the investment options offered under these plans provides an above-market rate of interest.

Our employees may participate in our qualified 401(k) plans and eligible employees can participate in a qualified employee stock ownership plan. We do not provide supplemental retirement benefits to any employees in connection with these plans.

 

Perquisites

 

We review the perquisites that our senior management receives. The primary perquisite is limited personal use of corporate aircraft.

 

We allow our Named Executive OfficersNEOs to use our corporate aircraft from time to time for personal reasons. The aggregate incremental cost to the Company is included, for proxy reporting purposes, as compensation to the Named Executive Officer. For tax purposes, we comply with IRS regulations. We do not “gross-up” our Named Executive OfficersNEOs for their taxes associated with perquisites, including with respect to personal use of our aircraft.

 

Our Named Executive OfficersNEOs also participate in our other benefit plans on the same terms as our other employees. These plans include medical and health insurance, company paid life insurance and charitable gift matching.

 

35


Table of Contents

Certain Board Fees

 

Our Named Executive OfficersNEOs do not receive director fees for serving on the Company’sCompany's board of directors or for serving on the boards of directors of our wholly-owned or majority-owned subsidiaries. However, those Named Executive OfficersNEOs who serve on the boards of directors of other companies in which we have a minority interest may receive director fees from those companies. We consider those board fees when evaluating the compensation of our Named Executive Officers.NEOs.

 

Employment Agreements; Compensation ArrangementArrangements for Mr. Bazos and Mr. Caffrey

We have no long-term employment agreements with our Named Executive OfficersNEOs although, from time to time, we have entered into short-term arrangements with newly hired executives governing their compensation and severance during up to their first three years with the Company.

 

Frank Bazos. In connection with Mr. Bazos’s hiring, the Company agreed to the following terms, which the CNG


Committee believes were reasonably negotiated and aligned with market practices:

1)a $1,500,000 sign on bonus payable in three equal tranches: upon signing, in March 2020 and in March 2021.
·The CNG Committee determined that this sign on bonus would provide market-competitive compensation for Mr. Bazos given his inability to earn any payouts from long-term incentive awards until 2022, consistent with our standard executive compensation program which is heavily weighted toward long-term performance-based pay.
2)an annual bonus for 2019 set at a target of $375,000.
3)in the event Mr. Bazos were terminated without cause prior to March 15, 2021, to receive any unpaid tranches of his signing bonus plus $875,000 and full vesting of any outstanding long-term incentives. After March 15, 2021, a termination of Mr. Bazos’s employment would be treated the same as applicable to any other senior executive (as described below).

On December 9, 2020, the Company announced that Mr. Bazos would resign from his current role on March 1, 2021 and become an advisor to management. On December 16, 2020, Mr. Bazos and WMC, acting with the approval of the CNG Committee, entered into an employment agreement (the “Bazos Agreement”) relating to Mr. Bazos’s service as an advisor. Under the Bazos Agreement, Mr. Bazos will (A) be paid a base salary at the annual rate of $250,000 and (B) continue to participate in WMC’s employee benefit plans. In addition, Mr. Bazos’s existing 3,600 unvested performance shares granted under the Company’s Long -Term Incentive Plan will remain outstanding.

Under the Bazos Agreement, and in accordance with the terms of Mr. Bazos’s original offer letter from when he joined WMC in 2019 and which terms are described above, (A) WMC paid Mr. Bazos (1) $500,000, consisting of the third installment of his original signing bonus, and (2) $875,000, representing the agreed payment in the event of Mr. Bazos’s departure prior to March 15, 2021, and (B) Mr. Bazos’s existing 3,600 restricted shares granted under the LTIP vested. The Bazos Agreement also provides that Mr. Bazos will be subject to certain restrictive covenants.

Liam Caffrey. On December 2, 2021, the Company in May 2019 in the position ofannounced that Mr. Caffrey would become its Executive Vice President and Head of Mergers & Acquisitions of WM Capital.  With more than 25 years of private equity experience, primarily in the financial services, healthcare and insurance sectors, Mr. Bazos joined as a senior leader of the Company as we executeChief Financial Officer on our strategy to thoughtfully redeploy capital generated from sales of significant businesses from 2015-2017.

The Compensation/Nominating & Governance Committee determined that securing the employment of an experienced executive like Mr. Bazos from the private equity industry required a competitive compensation package that would incentivize Mr. Bazos to depart a senior, highly compensated role at his previous employer to join White Mountains.  Therefore, we entered into a short-term arrangement with Mr. Bazos governing his compensation and severance during his first two years with the Company.  Following the initial two-year period, Mr. Bazos will have no long-term employment agreement, as is the case with our other Named Executive Officers.

March 1, 2022. In connection with Mr. Bazos’sCaffrey’s hiring, the Company agreed to the following terms, which the CNG Committee believes were reasonably negotiated and aligned with market practices:

1)a $1,500,000 sign on bonus payable in three equal tranches: upon signing, in March 2020 and in March 2021.

·The CNG Committee determined that this sign on bonus would provide market-competitive compensation for Mr. Bazos given his inability to earn any payouts from long-term incentive awards until 2022, consistent with our standard executive compensation program which is heavily weighted toward long-term performance-based pay.

2)an annual bonus for 2019 set at a target of $375,000.

3)in the event Mr. Bazos were terminated without cause prior to March 15, 2021, to receive any unpaid tranches of his signing bonus plus $875,000 and full vesting of any outstanding long-term incentives.  After March 15, 2021, a termination of Mr. Bazos’s employment would be treated the same as applicable to any other senior executive (as described below).

·The CNG Committee determined that these market-based arrangements appropriately reflect the risk taken by senior executives who, like Mr. Bazos, leave distinguished and established careers in adjacent industries to join a new organization.

1)base salary of $500,000.
2)participation in the Company’s annual and long-term incentive plans:
·annual bonus target of 75% of base salary
·long-term incentive grant for the 2022-2024 cycle of 1,250 restricted shares and 1,250 performance shares.
3)a $975,000 sign on bonus payable in three equal annual installments
·in the event that Mr. Caffrey voluntarily terminates his employment prior to March 15, 2024, he must reimburse the Company for any portion of the signing bonus he has received.
4)in the event the Company terminates Mr. Caffrey’s employment, other than for cause, prior to March 15, 2024, Mr. Caffrey will be entitled to a payment of $875,000 and will continue to vest in any then outstanding long-term incentives.

 

Severance Agreements; Change in Control

 

Severance benefits, if any, for our Named Executive OfficersNEOs are determined by the CNG Committee in its sole discretion. Executive officers of our operating subsidiaries participate in the severance plans, if any, generally applicable at those companies.

 

If any of our most senior executives were to retire, in order to enable the Company to ensure a smooth transition, to receive a non-compete/non-solicit from the executive and to retain access to valuable knowledge, talents and relationships, we generally would expect to enter into arrangements that would permit the executive to earn some or all of such executive’s long-term incentive compensation then outstanding.

 

36


Table of Contents

We have no standalone change in control agreements with our Named Executive Officers.NEOs. However, under our long-term incentive plans, if a change in control of the Company (or a business unit, as applicable) were to occur, certain events, such as involuntary or constructive employment termination or amendments to our incentive plans which are materially adverse to its participants, may cause stock options to become fully exercisable, restricted shares to become immediately vested and performance shares and performance units to become payable in full or in part. Our plans do not provide for tax gross-ups for excess parachute payments that may result from a change in control.control.

 


Compensation/Nominating & Governance Committee Report

 

The Compensation/Nominating & Governance Committee of the Company has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management and, based on such review and discussions, the Compensation and Compensation/Nominating & Governance Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.

 

Edith E. Holiday,Philip A. Gelston, Chair

Morgan W. Davis

Philip A. GelstonMargaret Dillon

Suzanne F. Shank

 

37



Table of Contents

 

Summary Compensation Table

 

The following table presents compensation in 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 20172019 for the Company’s CEO, CFO and its two other most highly compensated executive officers, and one additional individual for whom disclosure would have been provided had he been serving as an executive officer at the end of 2021 (collectively, the “Named Executive Officers”):

 

Name and
Principal Position

Year

 

Salary
($)

 

Bonus
(a) ($)

 

Stock
Awards
Granted
(b) ($)

 

Option
Awards
Granted
($)

 

Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compen-
sation
(c) ($)

 

Change in
Pension Value
and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)

 

All Other
Compen-
sation
(d) ($)

 

Total
($)

Year 

Salary

($) 

    Bonus
(a) ($)
 

Stock

Awards

Granted
(b) ($)

 

Option

Awards

Granted
($)

 

Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Compensation

(c) ($) 

 

Change in
Pension Value
and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings

($) 

 

All Other

Compensation

(d) ($) 

 

Total

($) 

G. Manning Rountree

2019

 

500,000

 

-

 

5,608,200

 

-

 

528,750

 

-

 

221,324

 

6,858,274

2021 500,000 -6,478,434 -- - 207,135 7,185,569

Chief Executive Officer

2018

 

500,000

 

375,000

 

5,186,048

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

186,545

 

6,247,593

2020 500,000 -5,788,476 -750,000 - 132,152 7,170,628

2017

 

500,000

 

500,000

 

5,492,600

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

140,524

 

6,633,124

2019 500,000 -5,608,200 -528,750 - 221,324 6,858,274

Reid T. Campbell

2019

 

500,000

 

-

 

3,738,800

 

-

 

528,750

 

-

 

140,409

 

4,907,959

2021 500,000 - 4,318,956 - - - 219,247 5,038,203

Executive Vice President &

2018

 

500,000

 

375,000

 

3,241,280

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

144,488

 

4,260,768

2020 500,000 - 3,858,984 - 750,000 - 146,398 5,255,382

Chief Financial Officer

2017

 

500,000

 

750,000

 

5,099,255

 

-

 

-

 

(1,001)

 

85,682

 

6,433,936

2019 500,000 - 3,738,800 - 528,750 - 140,409 4,907,959

Frank R. Bazos

2019

 

323,077

 

875,000

 

3,499,610

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

29,294

 

4,726,981

Executive Vice President &

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Head of Mergers & Acquisitions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Robert L. Seelig

2019

 

500,000

 

-

 

1,869,400

 

-

 

528,750

 

-

 

61,261

 

2,959,411

2021 500,000 - 2,399,420 - -- - 95,207 2,994,627

Executive Vice President &

2018

 

500,000

 

250,000

 

2,917,152

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

65,115

 

3,732,267

2020 500,000 - 1,929,492 - 750,000 - 29,484 3,208,976

General Counsel

2017

 

500,000

 

500,000

 

3,788,000

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

57,654

 

4,845,654

2019 500,000 - 1,869,400 - 528,750 - 61,261 2,959,411

J. Brian Palmer

2019

 

400,000

 

-

 

934,700

 

-

 

423,000

 

-

 

23,772

 

1,781,472

Managing Director and

2018

 

400,000

 

300,000

 

810,320

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

28,350

 

1,538,670

Michaela Hildreth2021 417,308 - 1,439,652 - -- - 55,176 1,912,136
Managing Director &     

Chief Accounting Officer

2017

 

390,385

 

600,000

 

1,060,640

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

13,475

 

2,064,500

     

Former Executive Officer:

     
Frank R. Bazos2021 288,462 500,000 - -- - 893,881 1,682,343
Former Executive Vice President &2020 500,000 500,000 3,644,596 -750,000 - 22,612 5,417,208
Head of Mergers & Acquisitions2019 323,077 875,000 3,499,610 -- - 29,294 4,726,981

(a)For Mr. Bazos, the amount in 2021 represents the third $500,000 installment of his original sign-on award granted to him upon joining the Company, the amount in 2020 represents the second $500,000 installment of a sign-on award granted to him upon joining the Company and the amount in 2019 represents a sign-on award of $500,000 paid to him upon joining the Company and a targeted annual incentive bonus of $375,000 for 2019. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”

(b)Represents the grant date market value of WTM performance shares granted in 2021, 2020 and 2019 and WTM restricted shares issued in 2021, 2020 and 2019. The WTM performance share awards included in the table have a maximum payout of 200% of the shares granted and, at such level, would have a grant date fair value equal to 200% of the amounts shown in the Grants of Plan Based Awards table. See “Grants of Plan Based Awards” and “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End.”

(c)In 2019, the annual incentive bonus program for named executive officers changed to a formulaic program, with the level of payout determined by reference to the Company’s growth in CVPS. Company performance in the year ended December 31, 2021 resulted in a level of growth in CVPS that produced no payout in March 2022 to the named executive officers. Amounts presented in 2020 represent annual incentive awards paid in cash in March 2021 for performance in the year ended December 31, 2020 and amounts presented in 2019 represent annual incentive awards paid in cash in March 2020 for performance in the year ended December 31, 2019. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”

(d)See next table for details of All Other Compensation.


 

(a)For Messrs. Rountree, Campbell, Seelig and Palmer, the amounts represent annual incentive bonuses earned for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.  For Mr. Bazos, the amount in 2019 represents a sign-on award of $500,000 paid to him upon joining the Company and a targeted annual incentive bonus of $375,000 for 2019. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”

(b)Represents the grant date market value of WTM performance shares granted in 2019, 2018 and 2017 and WTM restricted shares issued in 2019, 2018 and 2017.  The WTM performance share awards included in the table have a maximum payout of 200% of the shares granted and, at such level, would have a grant date fair value equal to 200% of the amounts shown in the Grants of Plan Based Awards table.  See “Grants of Plan Based Awards” and “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End.”

(c)In 2019, the annual incentive bonus program for named executive officers changed to a formulaic program, with the level of payout determined by reference to the Company’s growth in CVPS.  Amounts presented in 2019 represent annual incentive awards paid in cash in March 2020 for performance in the year ended December 31, 2019.  See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”

(d)   See next table for details of All Other Compensation.

38


Table of Contents

All Other Compensation

 

The following table presents a breakout of “All Other Compensation” included in the Summary Compensation Table for 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 2017:2019:

 

Name

Year

Director
Fees
(a) ($)

Personal
use of
planes
(b) ($)

Restricted
stock
dividends
($)

Company
contributions
to 401(k)
plan
($)

Employee
stock
ownership
plan
($)

Other
personal
benefits
(c) ($)

Total
($)

Year

Director

Fees 

(a) ($) 

Personal
use of
planes 

(b) ($) 

Restricted
stock
dividends 

($) 

Company 

contributions 

to 401(k) 

plan 

($) 

Employee
stock
ownership
plan 

($) 

Severance 

(c) ($) 

Other 

personal
benefits 

(d) ($) 

Total

($) 

G. Manning Rountree

2019

90,000

105,872

9,000

12,600

3,852

-

221,324

202190,00096,9543,00013,0504,131--207,135

2018

90,000

66,395

9,000

12,375

8,775

-

186,545

202090,00019,3406,00012,8253,987--132,152

2017

75,000

45,069

8,800

8,100

3,555

-

140,524

201990,000105,8729,00012,6003,852--221,324

Reid T. Campbell

2019

90,000

27,707

6,250

12,600

3,852

-

140,409

202190,000110,0662,00013,0504,131--219,247

2018

90,000

26,838

6,500

12,375

8,775

-

144,488

202090,00035,5864,00012,8253,987--146,398

2017

56,250

11,277

6,500

8,100

3,555

-

85,682

201990,00027,7076,25012,6003,852--140,409
Robert L. Seelig2021-77,0261,00013,0504,131--95,207
2020-9,8722,80012,8253,987--29,484
2019-40,0094,80012,6003,852--61,261
Michaela Hildreth2021-35,67540013,0504,131-   1,92055,176
    
    

Frank R. Bazos

2019

-

15,944

-

12,600

-

750

29,294

2021-1,70013,0504,131875,000        -893,881

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2020-3,2881,90012,8253,987-     61222,612

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2019-15,944-12,600-     75029,294

Robert L. Seelig

2019

-

40,009

4,800

12,600

3,852

-

61,261

2018

-

38,165

5,800

12,375

8,775

-

65,115

    

2017

-

39,499

6,500

8,100

3,555

-

57,654

J. Brian Palmer

2019

-

1,560

12,600

3,852

5,760

23,772

2018

-

1,620

12,375

8,775

5,580

28,350

2017

-

1,820

8,100

3,555

-

13,475

(a)Amounts represent director fees paid by BAM.

(b)Amounts represent the aggregate incremental cost to the Company for the use of aircraft that were not otherwise in use for business. For Company aircraft, the incremental cost is the direct cost per hour multiplied by the number of hours of use. For third party aircraft services, the incremental cost is the amount invoiced to the Company by the third-party aircraft provider.

(c)Represents a payment under the terms of Mr. Bazos’s employment agreement in the event of his departure prior to March 15, 2021. Mr. Bazos resigned from the Company on March 1, 2021 and became an advisor to management.

(d)Represents parking garage rental fees paid by the Company on behalf of Ms. Hildreth and Mr. Bazos.


 

(a)   Amounts represent director fees paid by BAM.

(b)Amounts represent the aggregate incremental cost to the Company for the use of aircraft that were not otherwise in use for business.  For Company aircraft, the incremental cost is the direct cost per hour multiplied by the number of hours of use.

(c)Represents parking garage rental fees paid by the Company on behalf of Mr. Bazos and Mr. Palmer.

39


Table of Contents

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

 

The following table presents grants of plan-based awards granted, except as otherwise noted, under the White Mountains Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “WTM Incentive Plan”) to the Named Executive Officers that received such awards during 2019:2021:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan
Awards (a)

 

Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive Plan
Awards (b)

 

All Other
Stock
Awards:

 

All Other
Option
Awards:

 

Exercise

 

Grant Date

 

Name

Grant

Date 

Type of Award 

Estimated Future Payouts

Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards (a) 

 

Estimated Future Payouts

Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards (b) 

All Other
Stock
Awards:

Number of

Shares
of Stock

or Units

(c) (#) 

All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities Underlying Options

(#)

Exercise

or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
($/sh) 

Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock
and Option
Awards

(d) ($) 

 

Grant
Date

 

Type of Award

 

Threshold
($)

 

Target
($)

 

Maximum
($)

 

Threshold
(#)

 

Target
(#)

 

Maximum
(#)

 

Number of
Shares
of Stock
or Units
(c) (#)

 

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options
(#)

 

or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
($/sh)

 

Fair Value
of Stock
and Option
Awards
(d) ($)

 

Threshold

($)

Target

($) 

Maximum
($)
 

Threshold

(#) 

Target

(#) 

Maximum

(#) 

G. Manning Rountree

 

 

 

Annual Incentive Bonus

 

0

 

375,000

 

750,000

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

 Annual Incentive
Bonus
 0375,000750,000 ---

 

2/27/19

 

WTM Performance Shares

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

0

 

3,000

 

6,000

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

2,804,100

 

2/25/21WTM Performance
Shares
 -- 02,7005,400-3,239,217

 

2/27/19

 

WTM Restricted Shares

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

3,000

 

-

 

-

 

2,804,100

 

2/25/21WTM Restricted
Shares
 -- -2,700-3,239,217

Reid T. Campbell

 

 

 

Annual Incentive Bonus

 

0

 

375,000

 

750,000

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

 Annual Incentive
Bonus
 0375,000750,000 -

 

2/27/19

 

WTM Performance  Shares

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

0

 

2,000

 

4,000

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

1,869,400

 

2/25/21WTM Performance
Shares
 -- 01,8003,600-2,159,478

 

2/27/19

 

WTM Restricted Shares

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

2,000

 

-

 

-

 

1,869,400

 

2/25/21WTM Restricted
Shares
 -- -1,800-2,159,478

Frank R. Bazos

 

 

 

Annual Incentive Bonus

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

 

5/1/19

 

WTM Performance Shares

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

0

 

1,900

 

3,800

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

1,749,805

 

 

5/1/19

 

WTM Restricted  Shares

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

1,900

 

-

 

-

 

1,749,805

 

Robert L. Seelig

 

 

 

Annual Incentive Bonus

 

0

 

375,000

 

750,000

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

 Annual Incentive
Bonus
 0375,000750,000 -

 

2/27/19

 

WTM Performance Shares

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

0

 

1,000

 

2,000

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

934,700

 

2/25/21WTM Performance
Shares
 -- 01,0002,000-1,199,710

 

2/27/19

 

WTM Restricted  Shares

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

1,000

 

-

 

-

 

934,700

 

2/25/21WTM Restricted
Shares
 -- -1,000-1,199,710

J. Brian Palmer

 

 

 

Annual Incentive Bonus

 

0

 

300,000

 

600,000

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

Michaela Hildreth Annual Incentive
Bonus
 0318,750637,500 -

 

2/27/19

 

WTM Performance Shares

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

0

 

500

 

1,000

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

467,350

 

2/25/21WTM Performance
Shares
 -- 06001,200-719,826

 

2/27/19

 

WTM Restricted  Shares

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

500

 

-

 

-

 

467,350

 

2/25/21WTM Restricted
Shares 
 -- -600-719,826

(a)These columns indicate the range of payouts (0%, 100% and 200%) targeted for fiscal 2021 performance under our Annual Incentive Bonus Plan as described in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” in this proxy statement. The actual payout with respect to fiscal 2021 for each named executive officer is shown in the Summary Compensation Table in the column titled “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation.”

(b)Messrs. Rountree, Campbell, Seelig and Ms. Hildreth were granted WTM performance shares for the 2021-2023 performance cycle. For the 2021-2023 performance cycle, the targeted performance goal for full payment of outstanding WTM performance shares granted under the WTM Incentive Plan for all NEOs is an 8% average growth in CVPS. Average growth of 3% or less would result in no payout and average growth of 13% or more would result in a payout of 200%.

(c)Messrs. Rountree, Campbell, Seelig and Ms. Hildreth were granted WTM restricted shares that vest on January 1, 2024.

(d)Represents the grant date fair value (based on a market price on the date of grant) as determined in accordance with ASC Topic 718 without regard to forfeitures. Assuming a maximum 200% payout, the grant date fair value of the WTM performance shares granted to Messrs. Rountree, Campbell, Seelig and Ms. Hildreth would be $6,478,434, $4,318,956, $2,399,420 and $1,439,652.

 

(a)These columns indicate the range of payouts (0%, 100% and 200%) targeted for fiscal 2019 performance under our Annual Incentive Bonus Plan as described in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” in this proxy statement.  The actual payout with respect to fiscal 2019 for each named executive officer is shown in the Summary Compensation Table in the column titled “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation.”

42

 

(b)Messrs. Rountree, Campbell, Bazos, Seelig and Palmer were granted WTM performance shares for the 2019-2021 performance cycle.  For the 2019-2021 performance cycle, the targeted performance goal for full payment of outstanding WTM performance shares granted under the WTM Incentive Plan for all NEOs is a 7% average growth in CVPS.  Average growth of 2% or less would result in no payout and average growth of 12% or more would result in a payout of 200%.

(c)Messrs. Rountree, Campbell, Bazos, Seelig and Palmer were granted WTM restricted shares that vest on January 1, 2022.

(d)Represents the grant date fair value (based on a market price on the date of grant) as determined in accordance with ASC Topic 718 without regard to forfeitures.  Assuming a maximum 200% payout, the grant date fair value of the WTM performance shares granted to Messrs. Rountree, Campbell, Bazos, Seelig and Palmer would be $5,608,200, $3,738,800, $3,499,610, $1,869,400 and $934,700.

40


Table of Contents

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

 

The following table presents outstanding equity awards under the WTM Incentive Plan, except as otherwise noted, to the Named Executive Officers as of December 31, 2019:2021:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Option Awards

 

Stock Awards (a)(b)(c)

 

Name

 Option Awards Stock Awards (a)(b)(c)

 

Type of
Award

 

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(# Exercisable)

 

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(# Unexercisable)

 

Equity
Incentive Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
(#)

 

Option
Exercise
Price
($)

 

Option
Expiration
Date

 

Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
(#)

 

Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
($)

 

Equity
Incentive Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested
(#)

 

Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market or
Payout Value
of Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested
($)

 

Type of

Award

Number of
Securities
Underlying

Unexercised

Options

(# Exercisable)

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(# Unexercisable)

Equity
Incentive Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options

(#)

Option
Exercise
Price

($)

Option
Expiration

Date

 

Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested

(#)

Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested

($)

Equity
Incentive Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested

(#)

Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market or

Payout Value
of Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested

($)

G. Manning Rountree

 

WTM Performance Shares

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

6,000

 

13,404,120

 

WTM Performance Shares--- -5,4008,226,090

 

WTM Restricted Shares

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

9,000

 

10,039,590

 

-

 

-

 

WTM Restricted Shares- 8,4008,516,760-

Reid T. Campbell

 

WTM Performance Shares

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

4,000

 

8,936,080

 

WTM Performance Shares- -3,6005,484,060

 

WTM Restricted Shares

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

6,250

 

6,971,938

 

-

 

-

 

WTM Restricted Shares

- 5,6005,677,840-
Robert L. SeeligWTM Performance Shares- -1,9002,843,520
WTM Restricted Shares- 2,9002,940,310-
Michaela HildrethWTM Performance Shares- -1,0001,421,660
WTM Restricted Shares- 1,4001,419,460-

Frank R. Bazos

 

WTM Performance Shares

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

1,900

 

4,242,738

 

WTM Performance Shares- -1,7003,454,060

 

WTM Restricted Shares

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

1,900

 

2,119,469

 

-

 

-

 

WTM Restricted Shares- -

Robert L. Seelig

 

WTM Performance Shares

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

2,800

 

6,256,056

 

 

WTM Restricted Shares

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

4,800

 

5,354,448

 

-

 

-

 

J. Brian Palmer

 

WTM Performance Shares

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

1,000

 

2,234,020

 

 

WTM Restricted Shares

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

1,560

 

1,740,196

 

-

 

-

 

(a)Equity incentive plan awards not yet vested at December 31, 2021 for Messrs. Rountree, Campbell, Seelig, Ms. Hildreth and Mr. Bazos include 2,700, 1,800, 1,000, 600 and 0 target WTM performance shares, respectively, for the 2021-2023 performance cycle and 2,700, 1,800, 900, 400 and 1,700 target WTM performance shares, respectively, for the 2020-2022 performance cycle. Payout values for WTM performance shares are shown at 100% of target for the 2021-2023 performance cycle and 200% of target for the 2020-2022 performance cycle and based on the December 31, 2021 closing market price ($1,013.90) including dividends declared since the grant date.

(b)Stock awards not yet vested at December 31, 2021 for Messrs. Rountree, Campbell, Seelig, Ms. Hildreth and Mr. Bazos include 2,700, 1,800, 1,000, 600 and 0 WTM restricted shares, respectively, that vest on January 1, 2024; 2,700, 1,800, 900, 400 and 0 WTM restricted shares, respectively, that vest on January 1, 2023; and 3,000, 2,000, 1,000, 400 and 0 WTM restricted shares, respectively, that vest on January 1, 2022. Market values are based on the December 31, 2021 closing market price ($1,013.90).

(c)Excludes WTM performance shares for the 2019-2021 performance cycle, which vested on December 31, 2021. See “Option Exercises and Stock Vested.”

 

(a)Equity incentive plan awards not yet vested at December 31, 2019 for Messrs. Rountree, Campbell, Bazos, Seelig and Palmer include 3,000, 2,000, 1,900, 1,000 and 500 target WTM performance shares, respectively, for the 2019-2021 performance cycle and 3,000, 2,000, 0, 1,800 and 500 target WTM performance shares, respectively, for the 2018-2020 performance cycle.  Payout values for WTM performance shares are shown at 200% of target for both the 2019-2021 performance cycle and the 2018-2020 performance cycle and based on the December 31, 2019 closing market price ($1,115.51) including dividends declared since the grant date.

43

 

(b)Stock awards not yet vested at December 31, 2019 for Messrs. Rountree, Campbell, Bazos, Seelig and Palmer include 3,000, 2,000, 1,900, 1,000 and 500 WTM restricted shares, respectively, that vest on January 1, 2022; 3,000, 2,000, 0, 1,800 and 500 WTM restricted shares, respectively, that vest on January 1, 2021; and 3,000, 2,250, 0, 2,000 and 560 WTM restricted shares, respectively, that vested on January 1, 2020.  Market values are based on the December 31, 2019 closing market price ($1,115.51).

(c)Excludes WTM performance shares for the 2017-2019 performance cycle, which vested on December 31, 2019.  See “Option Exercises and Stock Vested.”

41


Table of Contents

Option Exercises and Stock Vested

 

The following table presents stock awards that vested in 20192021 for each of the Named Executive Officers. No option awards were exercised by the Named Executive Officers during 2019.2021.

 

 

Name 

Option Awards ExercisedStock Awards Vested
 

Number of Shares 

Acquired on 

Exercise (#) 

 

Value Realized

on Exercise

($) 

 Type of Award 

Number of Shares
Acquired on Vesting

(#) 

Value Realized

on Vesting

($) 

G. Manning Rountree - - WTM Performance Shares(a)5,1605,383,531
      WTM Restricted Shares(b)3,0003,001,980
Reid T. Campbell- - WTM Performance Shares(a)3,4403,589,021
      WTM Restricted Shares(b)2,0002,001,320
Robert L. Seelig - - WTM Performance Shares(a)1,7201,794,510
      WTM Restricted Shares(b)1,8001,801,188

Michaela Hildreth 

 - - WTM Performance Shares(a)688717,804
      WTM Restricted Shares(b)400400,264
Frank R. Bazos - - WTM Performance Shares(a)3,2683,409,570
      WTM Restricted Shares(c)3,6004,194,432

(a)Represents 3,000, 2,000, 1,000, 400 and 1,900 target WTM performance shares awarded for the 2019-2021 performance cycle to Messrs. Rountree, Campbell, Seelig, Ms. Hildreth and Mr. Bazos, respectively, which became fully vested on December 31, 2021 at 172% of target. Value realized on vesting is based on the average of the closing price of common shares for the 5 days preceding the CNG Committee meeting on February 24, 2022, as determined by the CNG Committee, plus dividends declared since the cycle was granted in 2019.

(b)The amounts represent WTM restricted shares that vested on January 1, 2021.

(c)The amount for Mr. Bazos represents WTM restricted shares that vested on March 8, 2021 in accordance with the Bazos Agreement.

44

 

 

 

Option Awards Exercised

 

Stock Awards Vested

Name

Number of Shares
Acquired on
Exercise (#)

Value Realized
on Exercise
($)

 

Type of Award

 

Number of Shares
Acquired on Vesting
(#)

Value Realized
on Vesting
($)

G. Manning Rountree

-

-

 

WTM Performance Shares

(a)

5,220

5,893,745

 

 

 

 

WTM Restricted Shares

(b)

3,000

2,573,070

Reid T. Campbell

-

-

 

WTM Performance Shares

(a)

3,915

4,420,309

 

 

 

 

WTM Restricted Shares

(b)

2,250

1,929,803

Frank R. Bazos

-

-

 

WTM Performance Shares

 

-

-

 

 

 

 

WTM Restricted Shares

 

-

-

Robert L. Seelig

-

-

 

WTM Performance Shares

(a)

3,480

3,929,164

 

 

 

 

WTM Restricted Shares

(b)

2,000

1,715,380

J. Brian Palmer

-

-

 

WTM Performance Shares

(a)

974

1,100,166

 

 

 

 

WTM Restricted Shares

(b)

560

480,306

(a)Represents 3,000, 2,250, 2,000 and 560 target WTM performance shares awarded for the 2017-2019 performance cycle to Messrs. Rountree, Campbell, Seelig and Palmer, respectively, which became fully vested on December 31, 2019 at 174% of target.  Value realized on vesting is based on the average of the closing price of common shares for the 5 days preceding the CNG Committee meeting on February 27, 2020, as determined by the CNG Committee, plus dividends declared since the cycle was granted in 2017.

(b)The amounts represent WTM restricted shares that vested on January 1, 2019.

42


Table of Contents

Pension Benefits

 

The Named Executive Officers did not participate in any defined pension plans sponsored by White Mountains in 2019.2021.

 

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

 

The Named Executive Officers did not participate in any nonqualified deferred compensation plans sponsored by White Mountains in 2019.2021.

 

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

 

Employment and Severance Agreements

 

We have no employment agreements with our Named Executive Officers although from time to time we have entered into short-term arrangements with newly hired executives governing their compensation and severance for a period of up to their first three years with the Company. See “Compensation ArrangementArrangements for Mr. Bazos”Bazos and Mr. Caffrey” on page 36.37.

 

Long-Term Incentive Plans

 

Under our long-term incentive plans, certain events, such as retirement, death or disability, or the occurrence of both a change in control of the Company (or a business unit, as applicable) and an involuntary or constructive employment termination or materially adverse amendments to such plans, WTM restricted shares become vested and WTM performance shares become payable in full or in part. Below is a description of the payments to which each of our Named Executive Officers would be entitled assuming in each case that such events occurred on December 31, 2019.2021.

 

Voluntary Termination of Employment

 

Had any of our Named Executive Officers voluntarily terminated their employment on December 31, 2019,2021, their unvested long-term incentive grants would have been cancelled and payments, if any, in respect of those cancelled grants would be made at the sole discretion of the CNG Committee.

Involuntary Termination of Employment

 

In the case of Mr. Bazos, had he been terminated without cause on December 31, 2019, he would have been entitled to receive $1,875,000 and full vesting of any long-term incentives.  Had any of our other Named Executive Officers been terminated without cause on December 31, 2019,2021, their outstanding long-term incentive grants would have been cancelled and payments, if any, in respect of those cancelled grants would be made at the sole discretion of the CNG Committee.

 

Retirement

 

Had any of our Named Executive Officers retired on December 31, 2019,2021, their unvested long-term incentive grants would have been cancelled and payments, if any, in respect of those cancelled grants would be made at the sole discretion of the CNG Committee.

Death or Disability

 

Had any of our Named Executive Officers employed as of December 31, 20192021 died or become disabled on that date, they would have been entitled to pro rata vesting of their WTM performance shares and full vesting of their restricted shares. Under this scenario, Messrs. Rountree, Campbell, Bazos, Seelig, Ms. Hildreth and PalmerMr. Bazos would have been entitled to receive $19,233,742, $13,587,924, $4,702,859, $10,961,911$16,505,994, $11,003,996, $5,637,218, $2,592,974 and $3,389,327,$4,474,583, respectively.

 

43



Table of Contents

For purposes of computing the amounts above, the WTM performance shares were valued at the December 31, 20192021 common share closing market price ($1,115.51)1,013.90) including dividends since grant. The WTM performance shares would vest pro-rated for time and at 100% of target; provided, that in the case of the 2017-20192019-2021 performance cycle, values are shown at actual performance of 174%172%. Restricted shares were valued at the December 31, 20192021 common share closing market price.

Change in Control

 

Had both a change in control of the Company (or a business unit, as applicable) and an involuntary termination, constructive termination or materially adverse amendments to our long-term incentive plans occurred on December 31, 20192021 to any of our Named Executive Officers employed as of that date, they would have been entitled to full vesting of their WTM performance shares at up to 200% of target and full vesting of their restricted shares. Under this scenario, Messrs. Rountree, Campbell, Bazos, Seelig, Ms. Hildreth and PalmerMr. Bazos would have been entitled to receive $30,154,770, $20,941,313, $8,237,207, $16,084,544$25,584,480, $17,056,320, $8,832,530, $4,263,580 and $5,226,947,$7,318,280, respectively.

 

For purposes of computing the amounts above, the WTM performance shares, including the 2017-20192019-2021 performance cycle, were shown at 200% of target. The WTM performance shares were valued at the December 31, 20192021 common share closing market price ($1,115.51)1,013.90) including dividends since grant. Restricted shares were valued at the December 31, 20192021 common share closing market price.

 

Our long-term incentive plans do not provide for tax gross-ups for excess parachute payments that may result from a change in control.

 


44


Table of Contents

Director Compensation

Director Compensation

Our CNG Committee has adopted a compensation program for our non-employee directors that is focused on:

 

·attracting and retaining highly-qualified directors with a diversity of skills, backgrounds and experiences

·appropriately valuing the significant time and travel commitment required for our non-employee directors

·encouraging directors’ ownership of our common shares to further the alignment of their interests with those of our shareholders

·attracting and retaining highly-qualified directors with a diversity of skills, backgrounds and experiences
·appropriately valuing the significant time and travel commitment required for our non-employee directors
·encouraging directors’ ownership of our common shares to further the alignment of their interests with those of our shareholders

 

To that end, our non-employee director compensation program in effect for fiscal 20192021 included the following elements:

 

·an annual cash retainer of $135,000

·an annual equity retainer of 250 common shares

·an additional retainer of $100,000 and 100 common shares for our Board Chair

·an additional cash retainer of $15,000 for all members of the Audit Committee

·additional annual retainers (in addition to member retainer) of $85,000 and $25,000 for chairs of the Audit Committee and all other committees, respectively

Our CNG Committee annually assesses the structure of our non-employee director compensation program in light of market practices and emerging trends, and makes appropriate refinements if necessary.  To that end, the following changes to our director compensation program have been implemented for fiscal year 2020:

·Established share ownership guidelines of 5x cash retainer within five years of appointment to the Board

·Decreased the annual equity retainer from 250 common shares to 225 common shares

·Decreased the additional Board Chair equity retainer from 100 common shares to 90 common shares

·Decreased the Audit Committee Chair retainer from $85,000 to $35,000

·an annual cash retainer of $135,000
·an annual equity retainer of 225 common shares
·an additional retainer of $100,000 and 90 common shares for our Board Chair
·an additional cash retainer of $15,000 for all members of the Audit Committee
·additional annual retainers (in addition to member retainer) of $35,000 and $25,000 for chairs of the Audit Committee and all other committees, respectively

 

Our non-employee directors are not provided with any benefits other than participating in our employee matching gift program on the same terms as our employees, matching gifts up to $10,000 per participating individual.

As described in the notes to the table below, due to his extensive insurance industry expertise, Mr. Davis serves on the boards of threetwo subsidiaries and affiliates of the Company. For his service, he receives directors fees, paid by these companies, which are included under “All Other Compensation.”

 

45


Table of Contents

The following table summarizes director compensation for 20192021 (for directors other than Named Executive Officers):

 

Director

Fees Paid
in Cash
(a) ($)

Stock
Awards
(b) ($)

Option Awards
($)

Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation

($)

Change in
Pension Value
and Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings

($)

All Other
Compensation

(c) ($)

Total
($)

Yves Brouillette (d)

774

391,476

-

-

-

-

392,250

Peter Carlson

183,750

301,136

-

-

-

-

484,886

Mary Choksi

160,000

242,250

-

-

-

10,000

412,250

Morgan W. Davis

235,000

339,150

-

-

-

145,000

719,150

Philip Gelston

150,000

242,250

-

-

-

7,550

399,800

Edith E. Holiday

160,000

242,250

-

-

-

7,000

409,250

Lowndes A. Smith

235,000

242,250

-

-

-

-

477,250

David A. Tanner

150,000

242,250

-

-

-

-

392,250

Director

Fees Paid

in Cash

(a) ($) 

 

 

 

Stock

Awards

(b) ($) 

 

Option Awards

($) 

 

Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation

($) 

 

Change in
Pension Value
and Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings

($) 

 

All Other
Compen-sation

(c) ($) 

 

 

Total

($) 

Peter M. Carlson 

185,000 266,452 - - - 10,000 461,452

Mary C. Choksi 

160,000 266,452 - - - 10,000 436,452
Morgan W. Davis235,000 373,032 - -   - 120,000728,032
Margaret Dillon150,000 266,452 - - - - 416,452
Philip A. Gelston175,000 266,452 - - - 7,000 448,452
Suzanne F. Shank90,450 166,098 - - - - 256,548
David A. Tanner150,000 266,452 - - - - 416,452

(a)Mr. Rountree does not receive any additional compensation for his role as a director. Non-management directors receive an annual cash retainer of $135,000. Additional retainers in the following amounts are provided to those directors serving in the following roles: Chairman of the Board ($100,000), Chairman of the Audit Committee ($35,000), Chairman of any other Board committee ($25,000) and members of the Audit Committee ($15,000). Retainers were all paid in cash. Retainers relate to the period from May 2021 to May 2022, inclusive, and are typically pro-rated for partial year service.

(b)On May 27, 2021, all non-management directors received an annual grant of 225 common shares (with the exception of Ms. Shank, who was not elected to the Board until October 10, 2021). Mr. Davis received an additional 90 common shares for his role as Chairman of the Board. All common shares issued were valued at $1,184.23 per share, the market price on the date the shares were granted. Ms. Shank received a grant of 151 common shares upon her election to the Board on October 10, 2021, representing the pro-rata portion of the annual grant for the service period ending May 2022. These shares were valued at $1,099.99 per share, the market price on the date the shares were granted.

(c)Amounts shown for Mr. Carlson, Ms. Choksi and Mr. Gelston represent $10,000, $10,000 and $7,000, respectively, in matching payments from a company-sponsored charitable gift program. Amount shown for Mr. Davis represents $60,000 in director fees paid to him by Compare.com and $60,000 in director fees paid to him by NSM Group.


 

(a)Mr. Rountree does not receive any additional compensation for his role as a director.  Non-management directors receive an annual cash retainer of $135,000.  Additional retainers in the following amounts are provided to those directors serving in the following roles: Chairman of the Board ($100,000), Chairman of the Audit Committee ($85,000), Chairman of any other Board committee ($25,000) and members of the Audit Committee ($15,000).  Retainers were paid in cash except for Mr. Brouillette who received an equivalent value in common shares.  Retainers relate to the period from May 2019 to May 2020, inclusive, and are typically pro-rated for partial year service.CEO PAY RATIO

 

(b)On May 23, 2019, all non-management directors received an annual grant of 250 common shares and Mr. Brouillette received additional common shares in lieu of payment of his cash retainer.  Mr. Davis received an additional 100 common shares for his role as Chairman of the Board.  All common shares issued were valued at $969.00 per share, the market price on the date the shares were granted.  In addition, Mr. Carlson received a grant of 63 common shares upon his election to the Board on February 27, 2019, representing the pro-rata portion of the annual grant for the service period ending May 2019.  These shares were valued at $934.70 per share, the market price on the date the shares were granted.

(c)Amount shown for Ms. Choksi represents $10,000 in matching payments from a company-sponsored charitable gift program.  Amount shown for Mr. Davis represents $45,000 in director fees paid to him by Compare.com, $40,000 in director fees paid to him by MediaAlpha and $60,000 in director fees paid to him by NSM Group.  Amount shown for Mr. Gelston represents $7,550 in matching payments from a company-sponsored charitable gift program.  Amount shown for Ms. Holiday represents $7,000 in matching payments from a company-sponsored charitable gift program.

(d)   Mr. Brouillette resigned from the Board of Directors on August 29, 2019.

46


Table of Contents

CEO PAY RATIO

CEO Pay Ratio

 

Below is (i) the 20192021 annual total compensation of our CEO; (ii) the 20192021 annual total compensation of our median employee; (iii) the ratio of the annual total compensation of our CEO to that of our median employee, and (iv) the methodology we used to calculate our CEO pay ratio:

 

CEO Annual Total Compensation

$6,858,274

7,185,569

Median Employee Annual Total Compensation

$42,523

61,862

CEO to Median Employee Pay Ratio

161:116:1

 

Methodology

 

Our CEO pay ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with SEC rules. Our methodology and process are explained below:

 

(1)Determined Employee Population.  We began with our global employee population as of December 31, 2019, including full-time and part-time workers employed by our company or consolidated subsidiaries, but excluding our CEO.

(1)Determined Employee Population. We began with our global employee population as of December 31, 2021, including full-time and part-time workers employed by our company or consolidated subsidiaries, but excluding our CEO.

 

(2)Identified the Median Employee.  To identify the median employee, we calculated compensation for each employee using (i) base annual salary including estimated overtime pay as of December 31, 2019, (ii) cash incentives earned in 2019, (iii) WTM performance shares and WTM performance units vested on December 31, 2019, and (iv) WTM restricted shares vested on January 1, 2020.  Compensation paid in foreign currency was translated to the U.S. dollar equivalent based on foreign exchange rates as of December 31, 2019.

(2)Identified the Median Employee. To identify the median employee, we calculated compensation for each employee using (i) base annual salary including estimated overtime pay as of December 31, 2021, (ii) cash incentives earned in 2021, (iii) WTM performance shares and WTM performance units vested on December 31, 2021, and (iv) WTM restricted shares vested on January 1, 2022. Compensation paid in foreign currency was translated to the U.S. dollar equivalent based on foreign exchange rates as of December 31, 2021.

 

(3)Calculated CEO Pay Ratio.  We calculated our median employee’s annual total compensation for 2019 in accordance with SEC rules for preparing the Summary Compensation Table.  We compared the median employee’s compensation to our CEO’s annual total compensation in the Summary Compensation Table to determine the pay ratio shown above.

(3)Calculated CEO Pay Ratio. We calculated our median employee’s annual total compensation for 2021 in accordance with SEC rules for preparing the Summary Compensation Table. We compared the median employee’s compensation to our CEO’s annual total compensation in the Summary Compensation Table to determine the pay ratio shown above.

 


47


Table of Contents

TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS, PROMOTERS AND CERTAIN CONTROL PERSONS

Review, Approval or Ratification of Transactions with Related Persons

The Company’s Audit Committee Charter states that the Audit Committee shall approve any related or affiliated person transactions and review disclosures thereof. In determining whether to approve or reject a related person transaction, the Audit Committee takes into account, among other factors it deems appropriate, whether the proposed transaction is on terms no less favorable than terms generally available to an unaffiliated third-party under the same or similar circumstances and the extent of the related persons’ economic interest in the transaction. For purposes of Audit Committee approval, a related person transaction is defined as any transaction that is required to be reported under Item 404 of SEC Regulation S-K.

 

During 2019,2021, there were no Transactions with Related Persons that required Audit Committee approval.

 


48


Table of Contents

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

 

The following table provides information as of December 31, 2019,2021, with respect to the common shares that may be issued under the Company’s existing incentive compensation plans. Performance shares awarded under the WTM Incentive Plan are typically paid in cash, though they may be paid in the Company’s common shares at the election of the Compensation/Nominating & Governance Committee.

 

 

(1)

 

(2)

 

(3)

 

(1) (2) (3)

Plan category

 

Number of securities that may
be issued upon exercise or
vesting of outstanding options,
warrants and rights at target

 

Weighted average exercise
price of outstanding options,
warrants and rights

 

Number of securities remaining
available for future issuance under
equity compensation plans
(excluding securities reflected in
column (1))

 

Number of securities that may
be issued upon exercise or
vesting of outstanding options,
warrants and rights at target
 Weighted average exercise
price of outstanding options,
warrants and rights
 Number of securities remaining
available for future issuance under
equity compensation plans
(excluding securities reflected in
column (1))

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders - WTM Incentive Plan:

 

 

 

 

 

110,000 (a)

 

    

 

79,658 (a) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     

Performance shares

 

43,120 (b)

 

$         0

 

 

 

41,450 (b) $          0  

 

(a)Represents the amount of WTM shares available for issuance at target under the WTM Incentive Plan as of December 31, 2019.  To the extent granted as WTM performance shares, such shares could be earned at 0x to 2x the target number granted and, although typically in cash, may be paid in WTM common shares at the discretion of the Compensation/Nominating & Governance Committee.  As of April 1, 2020, 95,945 common shares remained available for issuance.

(a)Represents the amount of WTM shares available for issuance at target under the WTM Incentive Plan as of December 31, 2021. To the extent granted as WTM performance shares, such shares could be earned at 0x to 2x the target number granted and, although typically in cash, may be paid in WTM common shares at the discretion of the Compensation/Nominating & Governance Committee. As of April 1, 2022, 65,833 common shares remained available for issuance.

 

(b)Represents the target amount of WTM performance shares outstanding as of December 31, 2019, which includes 14,070 target performance shares for the 2017-2019 performance cycle that were settled in cash in February 2020.

(b)Represents the target amount of WTM performance shares outstanding as of December 31, 2021, which includes 14,625 target performance shares for the 2019-2021 performance cycle that were settled in March 2022.

 


49


Table of Contents

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

 

In connection with the audit of the Company’s financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2019,2021, the Audit Committee has: (1) reviewed and discussed with management and PwC the Company’s audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2019,2021, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting and PwC’s audit of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting; (2) reviewed and discussed with PwC the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) and the SEC; and (3) received the written disclosures and the letter from PwC required by the applicable PCAOB rules and discussed with PwC their independence.

 

Based on these reviews and discussions, the Audit Committee determined that the non-audit fees billed by PwC for services performed in 20192021 and 20182020 (as presented herein) are compatible with maintaining their independence. Further, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements be included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for filing with the SEC and for presentation to Shareholders at the 20202022 Annual Meeting.

 

Management is responsible for the preparation, presentation and integrity of the Company’s consolidated financial statements as well as for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, PwC, is responsible for expressing its opinion on the conformity of the Company’s audited financial statements with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”). In addition, PwC is responsible for expressing its opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. It is not the duty of the Audit Committee to plan or conduct audits or to determine that the Company’s financial statements are complete and accurate and in accordance with GAAP; that, as described above, is the responsibility of management and PwC. In giving its recommendation to the Board, the Audit Committee has relied on (1) management’s representation that such financial statements have been prepared with integrity and objectivity and in conformity with GAAP and (2) the reports of PwC with respect to such financial statements.

 

The Audit Committee has established a Charter which outlines its primary duties and responsibilities. The Audit Committee Charter, which has been approved by the Board, is reviewed at least annually, is updated as necessary and is available for viewing at www.whitemountains.com.

 

Lowndes A. Smith, Chairman

Peter M. Carlson, Chair

Margaret Dillon

Philip A. Gelston

David A. Tanner

 


50


Table of Contents

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

 

The Audit Committee, pursuant to its policy, pre-approves the scope and fees for all services performed by PwC. Annually, the Audit Committee receives and pre-approves a written report from PwC describing the elements expected to be performed in the course of its audit of the Company’s financial statements. All other audit, audit-related and non-audit-related services rendered by PwC also require pre-approval, which may be granted in accordance with the provisions of the policy either (a) at a meeting of the full Audit Committee, (b) on an interim basis by the Chairman of the Audit Committee, provided that the requested services are not expressly prohibited and are ratified by the full Audit Committee at its next regularly scheduled meeting, or (c) on a per-project basis through specific compliance with pre-approved definitions of services that do not exceed per-project limits established by the Audit Committee, provided that any such services are authorized by the Company’s General Auditor or his/her designee and that the General Auditor makes a full report of all services pre-approved per the policy at the next regularly scheduled Committee meeting.

 

It is the intent of the policy to assure that PwC’s performance of audit, audit-related and non-audit-related services are consistent with all applicable rules on auditor independence. As such, services expressly prohibited by the Audit Committee under its policy include bookkeeping or other services related to the accounting records or financial statements of the Company or its subsidiaries; financial information systems design and implementation; appraisal and valuation services; fairness opinions; contribution-in-kind reports; certain actuarial services; internal audit outsourcing services; management functions; human resources; broker-dealer, investment advisor or investment banking services; legal services; and expert services unrelated to the audit. All services performed by PwC during 20192021 and 20182020 were pre-approved in accordance with the policy described above.

 

The services performed by PwC in 20192021 and 20182020 are described below. PwC does not provide any services to the Company that are prohibited under applicable laws and regulations, such as financial information systems design and implementation. From time to time, PwC may perform permissible consulting services for the Company, provided they have been pre-approved in accordance with the policy described above. To the extent consulting services are provided by PwC, they are closely monitored and controlled by both management and the Audit Committee to ensure that their nature and extent do not interfere with the independence of PwC. The independence of PwC is also considered annually by the Audit Committee.

 

The following table sets forth the approximate aggregate fees billed by PwC for professional services provided in 20192021 and 2018:2020:

                    2021(e)                        2020(e)
Audit Fees (a)$  5,454,328$  3,756,918
Audit-Related Fees (b)588,750 1,170,932
Tax Fees (c) 364,922 810,629
All Other Fees (d)8,370 0

 

 

 

2019(e)

 

2018(e)

 

Audit Fees (a)

 

$  3,849,104

 

$  3,100,417

 

Audit-Related Fees (b)

 

310,600

 

301,750

 

Tax Fees (c)

 

335,023

 

776,662

 

All Other Fees (d)

 

12,188

 

9,326

 

(a)The fees in this category were for professional services rendered in connection with (1) the audits of the Company’s annual financial statements, including the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, (2) the review of the Company’s quarterly financial statements included in its Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, (3) audits of the Company’s subsidiaries, and (4) services that generally only the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm reasonably can provide, such as comfort letters and consents.

(b)The fees in this category were for professional services rendered in connection with (1) accounting and reporting consultations related to certain transactions and (2) services in connection with certain transactions.

(c)The fees in this category were for professional services rendered in connection with tax strategy assistance and tax compliance services.

(d)The fees in this category were for access to PwC’s proprietary technical accounting research and financial statement disclosure software tools.

(e)The fees reported include expense reimbursements of $173,494 and $69,295 in 2021 and 2020, respectively.


 

(a)The fees in this category were for professional services rendered in connection with (1) the audits of the Company’s annual financial statements, including the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, (2) the review of the Company’s quarterly financial statements included in its Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, (3) audits of the Company’s subsidiaries, and (4) services that generally only the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm reasonably can provide, such as comfort letters and consents.PROPOSAL 2

 

(b)The fees in this category were for professional services rendered in connection with (1) accounting and reporting consultations related to certain transactions and (2) services in connection with certain transactions.

(c)The fees in this category were for professional services rendered in connection with tax strategy assistance and tax compliance services.

(d)The fees in this category were for access to PwC’s proprietary technical accounting research and financial statement disclosure software tools.

(e)The fees reported include expense reimbursements of $152,282 and $119,984 in 2019 and 2018, respectively.

51


Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 2

ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

Pursuant to Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, in this Proposal 2 we are asking you to provide approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of the named executive officers as disclosed in the section of this proxy statement titled “Executive Compensation.” You are being asked to vote on the following advisory resolution:

 

RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed in the company’sCompany’s proxy statement dated April 7, 2020,6, 2022, pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion & Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion, is hereby APPROVED.

 

The Board of Directors believes that the compensation policies and practices described in the Compensation Discussion & Analysis are effective in achieving the Company’s primary goal of maximizing shareholder value over long periods of time, as well as motivating and retaining our key executives. The compensation of our named executive officers is heavily weighted toward variable long-term compensation, the value of which is tied to performance over a number of years.

 

We urge you to read the Compensation Discussion & Analysis, beginning on page 2225 of this proxy statement, as well as the 20192021 summary compensation table and related compensation tables and narrative, beginning on page 38,40, which provide detailed information on the Company’s compensation policies and practices and the compensation of our named executive officers.

 

Although the vote is non-binding, the Board of Directors and the Compensation/Nominating & Governance Committee will review and consider the voting results when evaluating our executive compensation program.

 

The Board recommends a vote FOR Proposal 2 which calls for the approval of the advisory resolution on executive compensation.


PROPOSAL 3

 

52


Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 3

APPROVAL OF THE APPOINTMENT OF

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR 20202022

 

Subject to Shareholder approval, the Audit Committee of the Board has appointed PwC as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2020.2022. Further, Shareholders are being asked to authorize the Audit Committee to negotiate and fix the remuneration to be paid to PwC in connection with its service. Representatives from PwC will attend the 20202022 Annual Meeting, will be provided with the opportunity to make a statement and will be available to answer appropriate questions.

 

The Board recommends a vote FOR Proposal 3 approving the appointment of PwC as the Company’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2020.2022.

 


53


Table of Contents

OTHER MATTERS

Manner of Voting Proxies

 

Common shares represented by all valid proxies received will be voted in the manner specified in the proxies. Where specific choices are not indicated, the common shares represented by all valid proxies received will be voted in accordance with the Board’s recommendation for each of the proposals named earlier in this Proxy Statement.

 

In the case of common shares held in employee benefit plans, the trustee will typically vote all common shares within such plans in direct proportion to those common shares actually voted by plan participants.

 

Should any matter not described above be acted upon at the meeting, the persons named in the proxy card will vote in accordance with their judgment. The Board knows of no other matters which are to be considered at the 20202022 Annual Meeting.

Votes Required for Approval

 

With respect to the election of directors, the nominees will be elected if the number of votes cast “for” such director exceeds the number of votes cast “against” that director. If a director in an uncontested election receives less than a simple majority of votes cast “for” his election, the director is required to submit a letter of resignation to the Board of Directors, which the Board may either accept or reject in accordance with the Company’s Bye-laws. The majority vote standard is not applicable to contested director elections, which are determined by a plurality of the votes cast. A plurality of votes cast means that the proposed director receiving the highest number of affirmative votes is elected, irrespective of how small the number of affirmative votes is in comparison to the total number of shares voted. The other proposals require the affirmative vote of a majority of the voting power held by holders of common shares present at the 20202022 Annual General Meeting, in person or by proxy, provided a quorum is present.

 

Inspectors of Election

 

Computershare Trust Company, N.A., 480 Washington Boulevard, 26th Floor, Jersey City, New Jersey 07310, has been appointed as Inspectors of Election for the 20202022 Annual Meeting. Representatives of Computershare will attend the Annual Meeting and receive votes and ballots, supervise the counting and tabulating of all votes and ballots and determine the results of the vote.

 

Costs of Solicitation

 

The solicitation of proxies will be made primarily by mail; however, directors, officers, employees and agents of the Company may also solicit proxies by telephone, internet or personal interview. Solicitation costs will be paid by the Company. Upon request, the Company will reimburse banks, brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for their reasonable expenses incurred in forwarding proxy materials to their principals.

 

Delivery of Documents to Shareholders Sharing an Address

SEC regulations permit a single set of the Annual Report and Proxy Statement to be sent to any household at which two or more shareholders reside if they appear to be members of the same family. Each Shareholder will continue to receive a separate proxy card. This procedure, referred to as house-holding, reduces the volume of duplicate information shareholders receive and reduces our mailing and printing costs. Those Shareholders who desire additional copies of this document or would like to receive separate copies of this document in the future should contact their bank, broker or other holder of record or the Corporate Secretary at the address presented under “Available Information” below.

54



Table of Contents

Available Information

The Company is subject to the informational reporting requirements of the Exchange Act. In accordance therewith, the Company files reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. The Company will provide to any Shareholder, upon request and without charge, copies of all documents (excluding exhibits unless specifically requested) filed by the Company with the SEC as well as the Charter of any of the Company’s various committees of the Board. Written or telephone requests should be directed to the Corporate Secretary, White Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd., A.S. Cooper Building, 26 Reid Street, Hamilton HM 11, Bermuda, telephone number (441) 278-3160. Additionally, all such documents are physically available at the Company’s registered office at Clarendon House, 2 Church Street, Hamilton HM 11, Bermuda and are available at www.whitemountains.com shortly after such material is electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC.

Non-GAAP Measures

Non-GAAP Measures

Information regarding the calculation of non-GAAP financial measures contained in this proxy statement can be found in Annex A: Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures.

Availability of Proxy Materials

 

Proxy materials for the 20202022 Annual General Meeting, including the Chief Executive Officer’s Letter, Notice of 20202022 Annual General Meeting of Members and Proxy Statement and the 20192021 Management Report are available online for viewing and downloading at: www.edocumentview.com/wtm.

 

Offices of the Company

 

The Company’s headquarters is located at A.S. Cooper Building, 26 Reid Street, Hamilton HM 11, Bermuda, its principal executive office is located at 23 South Main Street, Suite 3B, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755, and its registered office is located at Clarendon House, 2 Church Street, Hamilton HM 11, Bermuda.

Proposals by Shareholders for the 20212023 Annual Meeting of Members

Shareholder proposals (other than proposals nominating director candidates for which the procedures for are outlined on page 17)18) must be received in writing by the Secretary of the Company no later than Tuesday,Wednesday, December 8, 20207, 2022 and must comply with the requirements of SEC Rule 14a-8 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act in order to be considered for inclusion in the Company’s proxy statement relating to the Annual Meeting to be held in 2021.2023.

 

By Order of the Board of Directors,

Jennifer L. Moyer,

Corporate Secretary

 


55


Table of Contents

 

ANNEX A: RECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP MEASURESRECONCILIATIONS

 

Our 20202022 Proxy Statement includes certain non-GAAP financial measures that have been reconciledwe believe provide information useful to their most comparable GAAP financial measures. We believe these non-GAAP financial measures provide useful information to management and investors in evaluatingassessing our performance.financial condition and results of operations. There can be no assurance that our basis for computing these non-GAAP measures is comparable with that of other companies.

 

ReconciliationReconcilation of growth in GAAP book value per share growth to growthAdjusted Book Value Per Share

Refer to page 42 in White Mountains's 2021 Form 10-K

Reconcilation of Growth in Adjusted Book Value Per Share (“ABVPS”) as if theExcluding MediaAlpha Transaction had closed as of December 31, 2018

Refer to page 5871 in White Mountains’s 2019Mountains's 2021 Form 10-K

Reconciliation of GAAP total consolidated portfolio returns to total consolidated portfolio returns excluding the MediaAlpha Transaction

Refer to page 59 in White Mountains’s 2019 Form 10-K

 

 

 

Reconciliation from growth in ABVPS to growth in Intrinsic Value Per Share (“IVPS”("IVPS")

 

 

Years ended December 31,

 

Years ended December 31,

Growth:

 

2019

 

2018

 

2017

 

2021 2020 2019

ABVPS, as reported

 

14.8%

 

-2.8%

 

15.4%

 

-5.7% 24.2% 14.8%

reflect MediaAlpha transaction impact in 2018

 

-6.7%

 

6.0%

 

0.0%

 

0.0% 0.0% -6.7%

ABVPS[1]

 

8.1%

 

3.2%

 

15.4%

 

-5.7% 24.2% 8.1%

change in franchise value step-ups

 

1.9%

 

-0.6%

 

-7.0%

 

8.9% -0.4% 1.9%

IVPS[1]

 

10.0%

 

2.6%

 

8.3%

 

3.2% 23.8% 10.0%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Growth in Compensation Value Per Share[2]

 

9.1%

 

2.9%

 

11.9%

 

Growth in Compensation Value Per Share[2] - 3-Year Average

 

7.9%

 

 

 

 

 

Compensation Value Per Share[2]-1.2% 24.0% 9.1%
Compensation Value Per Share[2] - 3-Year Average10.6%   

 

[1]
[1]Adjusted as if the MediaAlpha transaction had closed as of December 31, 2018.

[2]Compensation Value Per Share is comprised using 50% each of IVPS and ABVPS.


 

 

[2]Growth in Compensation Value Per Share is the average of the growth in IVPS and ABVPS.

 

A-1


 

GRAPHIC

1PCF 01 - Morgan W. Davis 02 - Peter M. Carlson For Withhold For Withhold 04 - David A. Tanner For Withhold 03 - Susan F. Shank For Withhold Using a black ink pen, mark your votes with an X as shown in this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas. 03KJEB + + Please sign exactly as name(s) appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, corporate officer, trustee, guardian, or custodian, please give full title. Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the box. Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box. Date (mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below. Authorized Signatures — This section must be completed for your vote to count. Please date and sign below. B q IF VOTING BY MAIL, SIGN, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. q 2022 Annual Meeting Proxy Card Proposals — The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR all the nominees listed and FOR Proposals 2 and 3. A 2. Approval of the advisory resolution on executive compensation. 3. Approval of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) as the Company’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2022. 1. Election of Class I Directors to a term ending in 2025: For Against Abstain For Against Abstain Election of Class III Director to a term ending in 2024: You may vote online or by phone instead of mailing this card. Online Go to www.envisionreports.com/WTM or scan the QR code — login details are located in the shaded bar below. Save paper, time and money! Sign up for electronic delivery at www.envisionreports.com/WTM Phone Call toll free 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within the USA, US territories and Canada Votes submitted electronically must be received by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on May 25, 2022. Your vote matters – here’s how to vote!

GRAPHIC

Small steps make an impact. Help the environment by consenting to receive electronic delivery, sign up at www.envisionreports.com/WTM Notice of the 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders G. Manning Rountree and Jennifer L. Moyer, or either of them, each with the full power of substitution, are hereby authorized to represent and vote all Common Shares of the undersigned at the 2022 Annual General Meeting of Members to be held Thursday, May 26, 2022, and at any adjournment thereof. Shares represented by this proxy will be voted by the proxy holders subject to any directions indicated on the reverse of this card. If no such directions are indicated, the proxy holders will have authority to vote FOR the election of all director nominees and FOR proposals 2 and 3. In their discretion, the proxy holders are authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting. (Items to be voted appear on reverse side) White Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd. q IF VOTING BY MAIL, SIGN, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. q Change of Address — Please print new address below. Comments — Please print your comments below. Non-Voting Items C + +

MMMMMMMMMMMM C123456789 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 000004 ENDORSEMENT_LINE______________ SACKPACK_____________ Your vote matters – here’s how to vote! You may vote online or by phone instead of mailing this card. Votes submitted electronically must be MR A SAMPLE DESIGNATION (IF ANY) ADD 1 ADD 2 ADD 3 ADD 4 ADD 5 ADD 6 received by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on May 20, 2020. Online GIof ntoo welwewct.reonnviicsivoontrienpgo, rts.com/WTM delete QR code and control # or scan the QR code — login details are located in the shaded bar below. Phone Call toll free 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within the USA, US territories and Canada Save paper, time and money! Sign up for electronic delivery at www.envisionreports.com/WTM Using a black ink pen, mark your votes with an X as shown in this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas. q IF VOTING BY MAIL, SIGN, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. q + 1. Election of Class II Directors to a term ending in 2023: ForWithhold For Withhold 01 - G. Manning Rountree 02 - Mary C. Choksi For Against Abstain For Against Abstain 2. Approval of the advisory resolution on executive compensation. 3. Approval of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCooopers LLP (“PwC”) as the Company’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2020. Please sign exactly as name(s) appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, corporate officer, trustee, guardian, or custodian, please give full title. Date (mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below. Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the box. Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box. C 1234567890 J N T MR A SAMPLE (THIS AREA IS SET UP TO ACCOMMODATE 140 CHARACTERS) MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND + 1 P C F 4 5 7 8 1 1 037U5A MMMMMMMMM B Authorized Signatures — This section must be completed for your vote to count. Please date and sign below. A Proposals — The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR all the nominees listed and FOR Proposals 2 and 3. 2020 Annual Meeting Proxy Card1234 5678 9012 345

GRAPHIC

1UPX 01 - Morgan W. Davis 02 - Peter M. Carlson For Withhold For Withhold 04 - David A. Tanner For Withhold 03 - Susan F. Shank For Withhold Using a black ink pen, mark your votes with an X as shown in this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas. 03KJFB + + Please sign exactly as name(s) appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, corporate officer, trustee, guardian, or custodian, please give full title. Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the box. Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box. Date (mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below. Authorized Signatures — This section must be completed for your vote to count. Please date and sign below. B q IF VOTING BY MAIL, SIGN, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. q 2022 Annual Meeting Proxy Card Proposals — The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR all the nominees listed and FOR Proposals 2 and 3. A 2. Approval of the advisory resolution on executive compensation. 3. Approval of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) as the Company’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2022. 1. Election of Class I Directors to a term ending in 2025: For Against Abstain For Against Abstain Election of Class III Director to a term ending in 2024:

GRAPHIC

Notice of the 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders G. Manning Rountree and Jennifer L. Moyer, or either of them, each with the full power of substitution, are hereby authorized to represent and vote all Common Shares of the undersigned at the 2022 Annual General Meeting of Members to be held Thursday, May 26, 2022, and at any adjournment thereof. Shares represented by this proxy will be voted by the proxy holders subject to any directions indicated on the reverse of this card. If no such directions are indicated, the proxy holders will have authority to vote FOR the election of all director nominees and FOR proposals 2 and 3. In their discretion, the proxy holders are authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting. (Items to be voted appear on reverse side) White Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd. q IF VOTING BY MAIL, SIGN, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. q

 

q IF VOTING BY MAIL, SIGN, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. q + Notice of the 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders G. Manning Rountree and Jennifer L. Moyer, or either of them, each with the full power of substitution, are hereby authorized to represent and vote all Common Shares of the undersigned at the 2020 Annual General Meeting of Members to be held Thursday, May 21, 2020, and at any adjournment thereof. Shares represented by this proxy will be voted by the proxy holders subject to any directions indicated on the reverse of this card. If no such directions are indicated, the proxy holders will have authority to vote FOR the election of all director nominees and FOR proposals 2 and 3. In their discretion, the proxy holders are authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting. (Items to be voted appear on reverse side) Change of Address — Please print new address below. Comments — Please print your comments below. + C Non-Voting Items White Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd. Small steps make an impact. Help the environment by consenting to receive electronic delivery, sign up at www.envisionreports.com/WTM

 

MMMMMMMMMMMM Using a black ink pen, mark your votes with an X as shown in this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas. q IF VOTING BY MAIL, SIGN, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. q + 1. Election of Class II Directors to a term ending in 2023: ForWithhold For Withhold 01 - G. Manning Rountree 02 - Mary C. Choksi For Against Abstain For Against Abstain 2. Approval of the advisory resolution on executive compensation. 3. Approval of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCooopers LLP (“PwC”) as the Company’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2020. Please sign exactly as name(s) appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, corporate officer, trustee, guardian, or custodian, please give full title. Date (mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below. Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the box. Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box. + 1 U P X 4 5 7 8 1 1 037U6A MMMMMMMMM B Authorized Signatures — This section must be completed for your vote to count. Please date and sign below. A Proposals — The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR all the nominees listed and FOR Proposals 2 and 3. 2020 Annual Meeting Proxy Card

q IF VOTING BY MAIL, SIGN, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. q Notice of the 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders G. Manning Rountree and Jennifer L. Moyer, or either of them, each with the full power of substitution, are hereby authorized to represent and vote all Common Shares of the undersigned at the 2020 Annual General Meeting of Members to be held Thursday, May 21, 2020, and at any adjournment thereof. Shares represented by this proxy will be voted by the proxy holders subject to any directions indicated on the reverse of this card. If no such directions are indicated, the proxy holders will have authority to vote FOR the election of all director nominees and FOR proposals 2 and 3. In their discretion, the proxy holders are authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting. (Items to be voted appear on reverse side) White Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd.